• segfault11 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    9 days ago

    the american dream fell off so hard. it used to be about owning property and having a family or starting your own business, shit like that, but now it’s about being pandered to in advertising. pathetic.

  • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    FYI: These ads are “anti-woke” because they contain explicit and creepy dog whistles about “genetics”, not (merely) because they star lmayo people. Akilah is making a joke (or she’s oblivious), and Oli is observing a genuine (and disturbing) trend.

    I feel like this has to be pointed out, because right wingers often celebrate “fake” culture war victories over which we rightfully clown on them, but these are real IMO. It’s similar to all the companies dropping Pride month.

    Disclaimer: I haven’t seen the ad on the left; I’m assuming it fits the trend of the other two.

    Edit: It looks like the Arby’s one is just a photo shoot of a white woman, which may be why Akilah made the joke.

      • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        9 days ago

        The Sydney Sweeney jeans ad makes a bunch of “genes/jeans” puns that can be read as “white genes = good genes,” although it’s not explicitly presented as such and could be interpreted as “I got hot girl genes.” Which is the trouble with dog whistles, they take the same form as innocuous things. That being said, I’ve seen waaaay more “discussion of it being controversial” than people actually being offended by it, which flags for me that this might be more a manufactured outrage than an organic response. Like either American Eagle is planting “this ad be controversial” stories or the right wing outrage machine amplifying a small handful of critiques into “the left has been triggered by Sydney’s boobala!”

        No clue about the other two.

        • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 days ago

          The entire outrage and backlash-to-the-outrage cycle has been so obviously manufactured from the beginning. They’re playing chuds like a fiddle.

          I wonder how many millions of dollars a year the 22 year old dipshit consultant who designed these ad campaigns gets paid a year

  • RiotDoll [she/her, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    i genuinely dont understand this kind of racism

    how do you get threatened by people who aren’t like you getting marketed to?

    it’s a bit crazy making. i know the art of rhetoric gets used to mislead these folks, but that kind of bullshit requires a kind of base substrate to bloom properly - so what’s got Whitey so insecure that this is a thing?

    I’m white and I mostly just wanna be better than my ancestors, and do my best to not be a racist shithead? it’s easy and it sometimes feels validating and stuff - what in the fuck is going on. was it always like this. were we always like this? is my growing sense of alienation just me becoming aware of and pulling away, rather than some amplification of a new phenomenon?

    that’s slightly rhetorical, i just wanna invite analysis

    • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      generally speaking the closest thing a typical burgerlander experiences to engaging with public art is receiving advertising. they are isolated and miserable, and the only evocative experiences they have are ads, where much time and energy is expended to try and connect with them and make them feel something. like hungry for burger or sexually charged desire for an SUV.

      when they see an ad that isn’t trying to connect them, all they know is that they have been left out, they are alone and they’ve lost something they don’t know how to replace.

      the one true God is no longer reaching down from heaven to touch their heart and divinely inspire them specifically to order curly fries. because God doesn’t speak to them anymore.

      it is truly a pathetic phenomenon of the most wretched and unloved losers in history.

      • RiotDoll [she/her, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 days ago

        i’m religious too - i just feel like if there’s a God, it would want me to unify with and reconcile with other humans - anything that’s fundamentally alienating therefore needs be carefully analyzed, imo

        but there’s no doubt this wretched nation has lost the mandate of heaven. I just wonder how you have to be wired such that you inherit these trends?

        idk what i’m seeking really

    • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 days ago

      The core of the neoliberal turn and the conservative embrace of free market absolutism was the idea that letting the market dictate things meant white people living traditional lifestyles dictating things. Back in the 70’s, 80’s, and 90’s, those were the people with disposable income. So letting Mr. Market decide instead of pesky things like democracy or need meant a whites-oriented political economy without explicitly being whites-oriented.

      However, that’s not so much the case anymore. Not that white people are not economically advantaged, just that it’s now a combination of enough non-whites with disposable income plus the whites with disposable income are more likely to be urban professional whites with at least a surface-level desire to look multicultural (and it don’t get much more surface-level than fast food commercials). So the advertising industry went from “putting a mixed race or gay couple in an ad would be the death of the product” to “a mixed race or gay couple in an ad will bring in those sweet, sweet Brooklyn dad dollars.”

      This presented an existential crisis for “traditional” whites. The market was no longer catering to them, but they were too deep into the neoliberal game to truly turn on the market. This the sort of advertising minutiae we regard as background noise becomes a “canary in the coal mine” for their sense of identity.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Crackers are the most loyal lapdogs of the ruling class because they see themselves as porky’s fellow porks.

      So if their ego isn’t properly pandered to 100% of the time, they feel betrayed. Of course, this doesn’t lead them to proletariat consciousness that they were simply used by porky, but they double down in their loyalty while still hating them.

      It’s a lib book, but it’s very poignant and part of many socialist pipelines called What’s The Matter With Kansas? it explains everything and this phenomenon has been observed since the 2000s. Except now there’s hundreds of Rush Limbaughs and Fox News to tell the masses everything they want to hear and give them easy false answers to everything.

    • LangleyDominos [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Capitalism wants to sell products to everyone. Capitalism requires exploitation to function. Racism is required to justify exploitation. Capitalists, consumers, and producers absorb racism and take it at face value. Consumers want racism reinforced through consumption. Capitalists cater to them in order to sell products. Consumers are wholly unfulfilled as the things that would satisfy them have been stripped away in order to bolster consumption. Therefore it’s very important that their consumption cater to every part of their being, which includes the racism.

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    capitalist-woke: “Boy, I sure suck don’t I? Here’s some commercials where I show brown people aren’t all THAT bad! Might as well sell the rebellion against me!”

    frothingfash: “I knew it! Da jooz are taking away white people in commercials! Globalists, as the aryan master race, I COMMAND you to censor anyone who isn’t me! How dare insult the gods?”

    porky-happy: “Yeah sure, no problem. Glad we see eye to eye, fellow bourgeoisie!”

    amerikkka-clap: “We DID it! We stopped da jooz by asking them to stop!”

  • adultswim_antifa [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 days ago

    What is this Sydney Sweeney shit about? She’s been in like 20 commercials but this one has weird rightoids talking about… something. I can’t understand any of it.

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    It’s kind of strange seeing CHUD advertising going back to the “sex sells” kind of ads of a few decades ago. Did anyone actually like that idea? It just seem weird and uncomfortable to me. Maybe my greyace is showing, but I feel like it is at best irrelevant, and at worst, actively confusing.