• The_Grinch [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    It did look like LEDs, because they were in fact LEDs. It did look like a shock collar, because it is at best a vibration collar which is packaged in the same housing as a shock collar which is also on the market. Pushing back against people saying “oh it’s just an airtag” when it clearly isn’t just an airtag isn’t me falling for anything. Pushing back directly against someone ideologically aligned with you saying something which is in retrospect at least 90% correct, is still falling for it. I’m telling you to practice what you’re preaching and ignore what they’re saying. I’m not with them.

    I never said he shocked her, or shocked her on purpose, in that clip.

    • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      It did look like LEDs, because they were in fact LEDs.

      The claimed LEDs were some blurry white dots on both sides of the collar. The alleged shock collar / vibration device is just on one aide. The other was right where a metal clasp is.

      It did look like a shock collar, because it is at best a vibration collar which is packaged in the same housing as a shock collar which is also on the market.

      The same clip shows a GPS device. These are just nondescript black boxes.

      Are you familiar with dowsers? These are people convinced they can find water with a sixth sense, aided by a stick. They can’t really do it, but there is enough water out there underground and in reasonable enough places that they confirm their biases and are convinced of their powers.

      Pushing back against people saying “oh it’s just an airtag” when it clearly isn’t just an airtag isn’t me falling for anything.

      The white circle is an airtag, isn’t it? It looks like how they brand those things. Not that it needed to be an airtag: it is a blurry circle on a video. Airtag is just a reasonable guess among many.

      Pushing back directly against someone ideologically aligned with you saying something which is in retrospect at least 90% correct, is still falling for it.

      Yes that’s 2 DDG narratives you have accepted and defended. There was no basis for it, it is blurry stuff on a video, the narrative they spun is what you ran with.

      I’m telling you to practice what you’re preaching and ignore what they’re saying. I’m not with them.

      Then why are you repeating claims that only come from them? Surely you should default to racist Zionists not being on the up-and-up.

      I never said he shocked her, or shocked her on purpose, in that clip.

      Yes I know.