Image is of Venezuela’s Maduro and Colombia’s Petro walking together at the Miraflores Palace in Caracas in 2022, sourced from this article.


Ordinarily, I avoid straying into the American domestic situation, but the government shutdown appears to be continuing into increasingly harmful territory. If the situation is not resolved, soon tens of millions of Americans will lose food assistance, and already millions of federal employees are furloughed or are working without pay. To those not in the know, this situation has essentially stemmed from the Democrats refusing to sign off on the Republicans’ plan to substantially shrink Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, which would eventually result in tens of millions losing healthcare coverage and tens if not hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths.

To be clear, though, the Democrats have not exactly been paragons of healthcare: they not only oppose plans to make affordable healthcare a right (in defiance of wide popular opinion), but also do their part to maximize suffering. Biden’s policies during the pandemic ensured at least one million people died, and millions of children lost public healthcare coverage. We may never know the true toll, as the US decided that simply ceasing to report on a problem means that the problem no longer exists.

In other news, over the last couple weeks, the US has expanded their hostility against Venezuela by also including Colombia in their ire, and particularly the left-leaning leader, Petro. Both countries are now experiencing major economic and covert pressure by the US to try and cause regime change. The US has deployed an aircraft carrier to the waters near Venezuela and is conducting a military training operation with Trinidad and Tobago, which Venezuela has warned may be the prelude to the long-awaited attack.

Additionally, the US is attempting to combat Chinese geopolitical interest in central America and the Caribbean by carrying out digital attacks and launching pressure campaigns against Chinese and pro-Chinese countries and organizations. Given China’s enormous economic weight, if central America were to break all ties with China, it would be a catastrophe for them; such decisions would only be made by outright compradors, and the resulting economic problems would make their reigns unpopular and, hopefully, brief.


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    6 days ago

    european rearmament-heads when you ask them to actually rearm europe and not just import american stuff: https://archive.ph/u05m7

    ​The End of the FCAS Program? Germany’s New F-35 Deal Pushes Franco-German Jet Project to the Brink

    Berlin’s plan to buy 15 more American F-35 jets worth €2.5 billion could mark the end of the already troubled the FCAS project

    more

    Germany’s decision to purchase an additional 15 American F-35 fighter jets worth €2.5 billion could mark the final rupture in its already fragile defense aviation partnership with France. The move, revealed by Der Spiegel citing classified Defense Ministry documents submitted to the Bundestag’s budget committee, underscores Berlin’s growing dependence on U.S. technology, and highlights the widening cracks within Europe’s ambition to develop its own sixth-generation fighter under the FCAS program. The new aircraft will serve to replace Germany’s aging Panavia Tornado fleet, which currently fulfills the NATO nuclear-sharing role. Back in December 2022, Berlin ordered 35 F-35 jets to assume this critical mission starting in 2027. However, the German Air Force has reportedly concluded that the initial number was insufficient to maintain full readiness within the nuclear deterrence component, prompting the move to expand the fleet. The model in question is the F-35A aircraft, the conventional takeoff and landing variant that is both the most affordable and most widely used of the three versions. It is also the only one certified to carry the B61-12 free-fall nuclear bomb, making it indispensable for NATO members involved in nuclear-sharing arrangements. Beyond its nuclear capabilities, the aircraft offers versatility through integration with precision-guided conventional weapons such as the Joint Strike Missile (JSM), bolstering the Alliance’s overall deterrence posture.

    Yet, this pragmatic defense decision is unlikely to be well received in Paris. French aerospace giant Dassault Aviation, the manufacturer of the Rafale aircraft, has long criticized European states for choosing American platforms over homegrown alternatives. Its CEO, Éric Trappier, has repeatedly framed such moves as a “betrayal of European defense sovereignty”, and similar rhetoric is almost certain to resurface following Germany’s latest procurement. The timing couldn’t be worse for the Franco-German Future Combat Air System (FCAS) program, envisioned as Europe’s answer to the F-35 aircraft. Plagued by disputes over technology sharing and industrial leadership, the FCAS program has struggled to progress beyond early development phases. Dassault has insisted on retaining control over around 80% of the work share, a stance that has alienated its German partners and severely strained trust within the consortium.

    If Berlin’s new deal with Washington goes through, it may effectively seal the FCAS program’s fate. The perception that Germany no longer believes in the project’s viability could accelerate its collapse, leaving France increasingly isolated in its push for European defense autonomy. For many in Berlin, however, reliability and interoperability within NATO outweigh the political symbolism of “European independence”. Germany, meanwhile, appears to be quietly preparing a Plan B. Industry insiders suggest that Stockholm may emerge as an alternative partner, given Sweden’s proven record in developing advanced yet cost-efficient fighter platforms such as the Gripen jets.

    • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The UK is also buying it’s first F-35A variants under the same reasoning as Germany, daul capable aircraft for nuclear strikes. This is how they’re trying to normalise the idea of buying F-35As. First for the nuclear role, next for the general air force. Dassault has screwed FCAS with the work share requirements from a German perspective. I know it’s pessimistic, but I wouldn’t be surprised if FCAS and GCAP fail, the UK, Germany and Italy buy more F-35s, and Japan gets the F-47. And France gets whatever Dassault can come up with.

      Gripen

      I really like the Gripen as a jet (nothing to do with my country operating them, no bias), but it’s a 4th generation platform. Despite what Saab says, it’s not equivalent to a 5th generation stealth aircraft like the F-35. Honestly, it’s not even the best 4th gen. There are serious arguments that the F-18 Super Hornet+ Growler combination can do everything the Gripen E does, but better (see Finnish and Swiss trials). Comparing the two is pointless.

      • Tervell [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think the Sweden thing is about a hypothetical future aircraft rather than some upgraded Gripen, but even then, Sweden actually being able to develop one isn’t necessarily a given. Europeans can talk a big game, but the reality is that there are indeed things that the US makes that they simply can’t manage. Shouldn’t have deindustrialized!

        And even if some Swedish-German partnership could manage it, such a project would only be getting started now - so when would they even have a working solution, 2050?

        • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          The thing is Sweden just accepted their first Gripen E for their air force as an operational aircraft (not testing) a few days ago. There are only 12-13 Gripen Es in existence currently. I’m not joking. So any SAAB stealth aircraft is decades away. They’ll be making Gripen Es for at least another 15 years, till 2040.

          However it must be noted that Sweden did upgrade their Gripen C’s to a block configuration that’s almost as good as the E.