db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 29 days agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down110
arrow-up138arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 29 days agomessage-square18linkfedilink
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·28 days agoit’s a fact, not dogma
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·28 days agoAccelerationism is a religion.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·28 days agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·27 days agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-227 days agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·27 days ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squarefubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·27 days agoI find this sentence very funny
it’s a fact, not dogma
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
you’re making that up
I find this sentence very funny