db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 month agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down110
arrow-up140arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 month agomessage-square18linkfedilink
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoit’s a fact, not dogma
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoAccelerationism is a religion.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 month agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squarefubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoI find this sentence very funny
it’s a fact, not dogma
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
you’re making that up
I find this sentence very funny