db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 months agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up151arrow-down111
arrow-up140arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 months agomessage-square18linkfedilink
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-28 months agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
you’re making that up