- cross-posted to:
- communism@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- communism@lemmy.ml
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/29804343
Those who enjoy the wages of imperialism are more likely to have disdain for, or disinterest in, the complex struggles for national liberation in the periphery, which is dismissed as “the savage barbarism of the East,” in the choice words of Max Horkheimer.
This chauvinistic attitude has become so foundational to Western Marxism that theorists in this tradition often behave as if there were no need to actually study the history of socialist states in any serious manner. In fact, the attempt to do so is often looked upon with suspicion, as a sign that one might be a boor siding with the slaves, rather than a professional intellectual with a keen sense of what is worthy of scholarly inquiry.
- Gabriel Rockhill - From the introduction to Losurdo’s Western Marxism
condescending attitude toward AES while never having accomplished anything tells us all we need to know about western marxists.
Oh you’re building production facilities to feed and cloth your people??? That’s not very communist of you to not abolish the commodity form and wage labor.
Also countries are cringe, real communists don’t need one. Stop building things!
/s
You claim to be communist yet you haven’t abolished commodity production? That sounds like revisionism to me! /s
You’re joking, but the amount of people who have no clue that “communist” and “communism” are two different things is staggering.
its extremely common, hence why i joke about it lol.
But muh authoritarianism!
The best definition of authoritarianism: “When you tell white people they can’t do imperialism”
Alternatively: “When you tell white imperialists to get the fuck out of your country”
China doesn’t even stand up against imperialism in other nations and they still get called authoritarian.