Yeah, it’s ableism, as can be seen from how: a) anyone still uses the term “d–b” to refer to mute people and b) “d–bass” is totally in reference to an ass who shares a quality with a mute person. You can tell from the context, which is that it’s being leveled at a person who is mainly known for bloviating by means of speech in response to yet another unreasonable communication from her, which clearly means it is plausible and salient to liken her to a mute person. That’s just how language works.
We’ve discussed this issue on the site before. The reason a word like “dumb” is considered ableist here is not its previous meaning as “mute,” it’s that it currently is synonymous with “stupid” which is an intelligence-based insult.
Are all intelligence based insults ableist? I’m skeptical of this because I think lacking intelligence is not something inherently linked to disability. Plenty of disabled people, even mentally disabled people, are perfectly intelligent. Many neurotypical people are not intelligent, and much of that lack of intelligence is born of laziness and uncuriousness. I don’t think your average person who denies climate change because it was cold out yesterday is disabled in anyway, they just reject facts because acknowledging them would be too much work so they’d rather enjoy their ignorance.
Sorry, meant to defer to ND comrades, not to be dismissive. My personal take is that insults based on intelligence are ableist, despite ability not being equal to intelligence, because someone’s mental functions are never the reason for them doing or saying something reactionary. When you use someone’s perceived lack of intelligence as an insult, you’re reinforcing the idea that someone’s worth is (at least in part) based on having the correct mental ability.
FWIW I’ve used those words in an ableist way on this website before, even pretty recently. It’s one of the harder things to correct.
Yeah, it’s ableism, as can be seen from how: a) anyone still uses the term “d–b” to refer to mute people and b) “d–bass” is totally in reference to an ass who shares a quality with a mute person. You can tell from the context, which is that it’s being leveled at a person who is mainly known for bloviating by means of speech in response to yet another unreasonable communication from her, which clearly means it is plausible and salient to liken her to a mute person. That’s just how language works.
We’ve discussed this issue on the site before. The reason a word like “dumb” is considered ableist here is not its previous meaning as “mute,” it’s that it currently is synonymous with “stupid” which is an intelligence-based insult.
Are all intelligence based insults ableist? I’m skeptical of this because I think lacking intelligence is not something inherently linked to disability. Plenty of disabled people, even mentally disabled people, are perfectly intelligent. Many neurotypical people are not intelligent, and much of that lack of intelligence is born of laziness and uncuriousness. I don’t think your average person who denies climate change because it was cold out yesterday is disabled in anyway, they just reject facts because acknowledging them would be too much work so they’d rather enjoy their ignorance.
https://hexbear.net/post/5702644
Okay, doesn’t answer my question
Sorry, meant to defer to ND comrades, not to be dismissive. My personal take is that insults based on intelligence are ableist, despite ability not being equal to intelligence, because someone’s mental functions are never the reason for them doing or saying something reactionary. When you use someone’s perceived lack of intelligence as an insult, you’re reinforcing the idea that someone’s worth is (at least in part) based on having the correct mental ability.
FWIW I’ve used those words in an ableist way on this website before, even pretty recently. It’s one of the harder things to correct.