First they came for the White Nationalists
And I did not speak out
Because it was based
Then they came for the pro-Whites
And I did not speak out
Because it was based
Then they came for the pro-Western Culturists
And I did not speak out
Because it was based
Then they came for the anti-Marxists
And I did not speak out
Because it was based
Then they came for the Christians
And I did not speak out
Because it was based
Then they came for the Whites
And I did not speak out
Because it was based
Then I still did not speak out
Because there was no one left
to come after me
Fascism in a nutshell:
: “We are genetically flawless….VICTIMS!”
Designed in a lab and grown in a vat for a singular purpose: To eat shit spectacularly.
Erm… mods!!! Admins!!! This “”“”““moderator””“”“”" is Ya[REDACTED]b posting anf most be banned posthaste!!!
Why in 2019-2022 do they need to outlaw the same thing 4 times
Do you mean 2019-2023?
Christians can at least occasionally be leftist (see: Claudia de la Cruz), but anyone who identifies as one of the first four is 100% a fascist, no exceptions.
70% of all Christians aren’t white, and Christianity started in the middle east
Trump was in office in 2019 and 2020 lol
Illegal to be White.
The same kind of people who tell BIPOC, “Racism doesn’t exist in this country anymore. Stop playing the victim!” as they gaslight us about the racism we’ve experienced act like the biggest victims ever just because they’re coated in mayo.
What I’m learning is that it’s still legal to be cis? Not good enough
That post is from 2019 or earlier, fascists didn’t know what cis means back then
I think that would have made 2025 unlimited genocide on the crackkkers of the first world
Paradox of tolerance. Hope this helps!
There is no paradox, tolerance is a social contract and the intolerant are those who reject it and are thus not entitled to tolerance themselves
Most paradoxes aren’t true paradoxes, they’re just things that someone can’t solve with their current information or way of thinking. 🤓
literally “if I can’t describe an ethical standard in one sentence or less then it must be a paradox”