• markinov@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Deepseek does incredibly far more harm than good. It accelerated the progress and view of what models are capable of and while Open Source paradigm is good fundamentaly, it is not in fact a good thing to give more tools and weapons for our enemies

    it does not. AI existing doesn’t make it good or bad, which is the premise of your argument, and i don’t agree with it at all. and an open source model is far better than a closed source model owned and controlled by my enemies. open source models democratizes the AI, and gives control to the workers far more than the “enemies”.

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      AI existing doesn’t make it good or bad

      Ok so we have nothing to talk about, you are purposely forgetting how AI models were created in the first place just to argue. Yes talk about democratization of AI when both US and the rest of the world completely skipped over the moral argument over AI training without consent. None of this AI would exist if “democratic” principles were even relevant in the first place. We failed the moral guideline check on the very first hurdle already.

      All you’re saying is workers need to take yet another L and compromise, “hey we know this is all built without your consent and with stolen data but hey AI is here now so maybe its not that bad if we promised not to do something even more evil with it.”

      Your initial proposal was AI under a socialist system. Yeah I have better dreams to put myself to sleep.