yet MIT found the biggest ROI in back-office automation—eliminating business process outsourcing, cutting external agency costs, and streamlining operations.
I think that’s just the business way of saying “AI can do a managers job better than a manager”
a toddler could do a managers job better than most managers
There’s an entire class or “workers” who’s job is to pretend to be competent while intentionally being as incompetent as possible because they have to force their underlings to suffer to justify their positions of power.
PMCAI when?
Vertical integration lol.
This finding is particularly relevant in financial services and other highly regulated sectors, where many firms are building their own proprietary generative AI systems in 2025. Yet, MIT’s research suggests companies see far more failures when going solo.
There’s a lot to read between the lines here. It seems like privately there’s a proliferation of purpose-built models, which probably means a lot of within-sector redundancy and Even. More. Data Centeeeeers.
“Almost everywhere we went, enterprises were trying to build their own tool,” he said, but the data showed purchased solutions delivered more reliable results.
I’m sure there’s no conflict of interest lurking in that data at all.
