Hi all, I wanted to share the outcome of today’s Council meeting regarding this proposal. After several weeks of discussion and incorporating feedback from our community into better revisions of the initial proposal, the Fedora Council has approved the latest version of the AI-Assisted Contributions policy formally. The agreed-upon version can be read in this ticket. You can read the full meeting transcript in the meeting log. So what happens next? Firstly, on behalf of the Fedora Council I...
Who even knows at this point. Many of the highest paid consultants, lawyers and lobbyists argue about whether creating models that regurgitate copyrighted material is covered by the datamining exception in EU copyright law. They don’t benefit from a quick solution. I’m sure the situation in the US is just as dumb.
Licensing can only give you additional rights to use a copyrighted work, it can’t really take away rights that you would have even without a license.
Imho, generative AI should probably be treated like (lossy) compression. Especially when models created based on works with the intention to create similar works.
Who even knows at this point. Many of the highest paid consultants, lawyers and lobbyists argue about whether creating models that regurgitate copyrighted material is covered by the datamining exception in EU copyright law. They don’t benefit from a quick solution. I’m sure the situation in the US is just as dumb.
Licensing can only give you additional rights to use a copyrighted work, it can’t really take away rights that you would have even without a license.
Imho, generative AI should probably be treated like (lossy) compression. Especially when models created based on works with the intention to create similar works.