Climate activists are usually very against nuclear energy and I don’t think I understand why. Does anyone know?

Arguments I’m somewhat familiar with:

  • sometimes it’s used as a cover for developing nuclear weapons
  • nuclear waste is very bad for living things.

What are the main historical moral arguments?

  • Ekranoplane [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A nuclear reactor needs to be safe 100% of the time. Not 99.99% of the time. Shit needs to be tsunami-proof and idiot-proof and meteor-proof or you risk permanently poisoning a continent. It’s possible to do if you build it inside a mountain or something, but at this point solar is so cheap it no longer makes sense.