The drama and accusations the GrapheneOS developers are spewing and engaging in are giving me a bad taste in the mouth and make me doubt the OS’s reliability am I the only one?

  • upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Not as bad a taste as the French government is giving me.

    If its do I trust GOS or a confirmed pro chat control governments side of the story, its an easy choice.

  • limer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    I would prefer my privacy software to be developed by people like this, rather than people who are calm and flexible

    • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      The guy being paranoid asshole is passable, what I thought a really shit move is calling the community to create alt accs to harass people from other projects and saying he will ban anyone that complains. The Rossmann video is quite shocking, you see the dev’s complete disassociation with reality… yeah the code is open, but how many people outside the project are really auditing it? Even people inside the project, are they auditing each others’ work? If the guy doesn’t get treatment, how long until he decides his own userbase is after him?

      • ganymede@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        admittedly i’m not up to date on all the drama, but i thought that graphene saw themselves as victims of alt attacks?

        • PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          So yeah, it seems like he accuses everyone of persecuting and harassing him, but in those videos there are several examples of what he considers persecuting and harassing. Both channels were highly supportive of the project and actively promoted it, but because they would also promote other projects and do benchmark tests, they were “spreading misinformation”, “being biased”, “campaigning against him” and so on. And in the second video he accused the guy of campaigning against him just for saying “This is informative, and unfortunate” about the first video lol. So him being a “victim” is just his lack of proper medication, because anyone who asked him about such attacks, if he had prints or so, was also accused of attacking him lol

          https://youtu.be/Dx7CZ-2Bajg
          https://youtu.be/4To-F6W1NT0

          Undoubtly GrapheneOS is the best project out there, so yeah, this is unfortunate.

  • PrivacyDingus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Two things can simultaneously be true, Daniel can be an individual who engages in very problematic behaviours and GrapheneOS can still be the most-secure and reliable OS out there.

    • jherazob@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      24 days ago

      Basically this. The project head might be a bit too paranoid, bellicose and problematic, but at this time a phone with GrapheneOS seems to be by far the safest way to have a smartphone, and the project head’s personality might be a part on this as their stated objective is to be able to resist state-level actors, you likely need someone who’s more than a bit “out there” to have the right mind for this

    • freedickpics@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Exactly. The lead dev can come across as frustrated or confrontational on his social media posts but really the amount of noobs criticising Graphene for nonsense reasons or repeatedly bringing up other ‘secure’ OSes to him that he’s already thoroughly debunked again and again like e/OS would drive me insane

  • sheinar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    I’ve accepted for a while that the lead developer is extremely paranoid and could probably genuinely do with healthcare intervention. Like in much open source development I think it isn’t helped by overwork and burnout, so I hope that at some point Graphene gets a better governance structure which spreads responsibility and which hopefully will limit the incessant drama that only harms the project. I don’t see him being willing to give up his grip, but I can always hope.

    I’ll continue to use Graphene unless things go entirely off the rails though, as it is a great OS and I don’t really think there are many great alternatives.

  • Catalyst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    They’re being threatened by the entire French government. Its not drama. This is a very real situation.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I wouldn’t trust a sane person to do a ultra private phone OS.

    You need the paranoia, you need to see the shadows move to do it right.

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    GrapheneOS has always had a massive PR problem and crazy leadership unfortunately.

  • ganymede@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    some of it is kind of inevitable when you see how far ahead from everyone else they are technically and when people shitting on their work just aren’t at their (technical) level it seems to be very draining. and eventually lead to dramas.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    I don’t care about the community, I just care about the experience of using it.