• buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    “This bill may have unintended consequences of creating a hostile environment for providers of rental housing and could result in further diminished supply of rental housing based on inadequate data.”

    The idea that landlords provide housing is so insanely ass-backwards

    • DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 days ago

      Landlords provide housing in the same way insurance companies provide healthcare. It’s cynical neoliberal semantic dancing.

    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      Rent counts toward GDP so if the state built housing and provided it for free that would make the country less economically productive, since all that money going towards rent no longer is, and all you would get for it is housing for everyone

      (/s)

  • lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 days ago

    Antitrust and anti monopoly pricing? Collusion between competitors? Yeah we’re not having that. Which is great because the contradictions will destroy capitalism

  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    In his veto letter, Polis said he agreed with the intent of the bill, writing that “collusion between landlords for purposes of artificially constraining rental supply and increasing costs on renters is wrong.”

    But, he said, such practices are already illegal under Colorado’s Antitrust Act, and “violators should be held accountable” under existing law.

    You stupid fuck. Even if the law is entirely redundant, you pass it, take credit for it, drop the hammer on the price-fixing landlords, and become a public hero. Simple fucking politics.

    Fucking Democrats.