• InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 days ago

      I can imagine.

      Reporter on zoom: “You and your wife have said you’ve kept in quarantine.”

      “Yeah.”

      Reporter: “Here’s a social media photo selfie of you and your wife at Walmart - yesterday.”

      “Yeah.”

      Reporter: “So in fact - both of you broke quarantine.”

      “Yeah, no. We needed diapers. And she always complains I buy the wrong ones.”

      “He always buys the wrong ones. He drives - I shop.”

    • mickey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Agree, or at best “quarantining” like COVID “lock down” where they still go to the store or visit someone’s house or pop down to a bar or cafe real quick, and still view it as the most egregious restriction of individual freedom in their lifetime.

        • mickey [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          I remember people being serious about not being able to get their hair cut as something that needed to be weighed against the utility of public health measures. Or a person suggesting to me that because we have 40,000 automobile deaths a year we should accept that many COVID deaths. No! That death toll indicates a sick society that has accepted needless car deaths, not that that is a baseline number of acceptable fatalities. Then the COVID death toll that first year was probably 10x that number. I don’t mean to get too serious here, there is just this really weird divide between I feel between people who integrate their continued experiences over time and people who are like, yeah no those things I forcefully and sincerely advocated for 3-4 years ago don’t mean anything blob-no-thoughts