B-Fed
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 days ago

The U.S. Is on Track to Lose a War With China

www.theatlantic.com

external-link
message-square
8
link
fedilink
35
external-link

The U.S. Is on Track to Lose a War With China

www.theatlantic.com

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 5 days ago
message-square
8
link
fedilink
Modern warfare is decided by production capacity and technological mastery, not by individual valor.

https://archive.is/bGE9I

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 days ago

    China:

    America: I think if we go to war it’ll turn out badly for us.

    China (and normal people): What? I didn’t even say anything, where is this coming from? confusion

    This is like sitting next to someone and they just randomly say “If I decided to attack you I think perhaps you’d win that fight”; like bro I was just having nachos, what prompted that?!

  • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    don’t bury the lede, yog. obviously the headline is not news, so it took me a minute to realize the news here is that the atlantic is saying it

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      haha basically, looks like the empire is entering the acceptance stages of grief here

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I don’t really think two countries on completely opposite sides of the world can go to war. They will just nuke each other to shit.

    If the US sends its troops to China? They’ll lose because they will have a logistical disadvantage.

    If China sends its troops to the US? They’ll lose because they will have a logistical disadvantage.

    It’s basically not possible to have a regular war between two countries so far apart. Intercepting the supply is too easy, cutting off the frontline’s ability to do any push. The only possible way you can even this out is by having a neighbouring country become your base of operations for the war. You still have to do logistics between your home country and that country though. This I think is why the US included Japan in the “Core 5”.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      The idea of the US fighting a conventional war with China is absolutely fantastical.

  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    Good.

  • SwitchyandWitchy [she/her]@hexbear.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    We thought this article looked familiar. You posted it in c/chapo back when it was new.

    We stand by our original reaction to it.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      oh yeah haha forgot about it

news@hexbear.net

news@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !news@hexbear.net

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

– PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE –

Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.

If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.

Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.

Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.

Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.

Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like ‘Raid: Shadow Legends’ in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 477 users / day
  • 1.14K users / week
  • 1.67K users / month
  • 3.47K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 24.5K subscribers
  • 4.91K Posts
  • 80K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Alaskaball [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
  • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.net
  • Breath_Of_The_Snake [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org