(boy’s love writers, so i guess more yaoi then slash) admit i didn’t read the whole article because it seems ridiculous and western reporting on China is like 90% fabrications. someone educate me on whatever this is. is it conservative local governments doing local government shit?

my partner loves this shit especially from China and i don’t want to inform her about some made up BS designed to radicalize the slash and yaoi community against the CPC

    • Monstertruckenjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      He’s doubting RFA’s reporting, not that China has never committed a human rights violation.

      If your question is “how can we, the West, analyze and critique this” then the answer is that we cannot based on biased sources

        • Monstertruckenjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I’m saying this is impossible to properly dissect with this source. I’m not attacking you lol, I’m trying to explain the disagreement

          My bad for assuming you’re from “the West” though. It’s a predominantly English speaking forum so that’s the baseline I was working with

        • AnarchoAnarchist [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Jumping to assume the most nefarious possible motive based on a western propaganda outlet is silly.

          Nobody has said it is impossible that China has engaged in persecution of LGBTQIA+ people. But we have pointed out assuming this is an example of discrimination, based on a piece of propaganda, from an outlet with the mission to make China look as bad as possible, without anything close to independent corroboration, is foolish.

            • AnarchoAnarchist [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              All I know is if you assume the opposite of whatever the US State Department or it’s affiliated media outlets says, you will be right more often than not.

              State Department says “Evil SeeSeePee hates the gays and so they arrested a bunch of them” - I will assume the opposite until and unless credible reporting comes out to corroborate the propaganda outlets claims.

                • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  Unfortunately I agree with the person you are talking to here. You have to start at a baseline, and there is no such thing as ‘true neutrality’. You are overall better off when doing a media investigation assuming that any apparatus of the U.S. media arm has misrepresented any given story, particularly when it comes to reporting about China and Chinese law and punishment. Doesn’t mean it’s always the correct position to take sans research, but it isn’t a reactionary position for me because it comes from years of doing this kind of media backtracking. It’s mostly pragmatism at this point, as they can spew lies faster than I can investigate them.

                  It is applied as a general rule of thumb, but also specifically in this context.

                  Edit: Not to contradict your experience at all though, There is plenty of queerphobia in China, as you and plenty of others I have talked to on the subject have said. It wouldn’t be surprising if there was some sort of crackdown on slash-fics, but how widespread is it, is it actually a national mandate (is it ‘China’ or just some specific regional politicians bugaboo), is it targeting specifically queer artists or just obscenity in general, these are the kinds of questions I wouldn’t put it past RFA to completely and purposefully underreport.

                • AnarchoAnarchist [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  I think uncritically swallowing US propaganda without any additional research makes you a convenient lapdog of the empire.

                  Edit. This is harsh and I have edited my comment. Regardless. I will not assume homophobic intent based souly on a single propaganda piece. If actual evidence of maliciousness exists I am happy to take it into consideration; but if Voice of America said the sky is blue I would look out a window to confirm.

    • CrawlMarks [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yes. I am saying the reporting of RFA is specifically removed from context to the extent that if they have a story about a true event reading it will likely lead you to an incorrect conclusion. So in effect any story you see there is fake.