• That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Man in the High Castle tv show. The premise was interesting, Nazis taking over the US and the population figting back. However, the show quickly devolved into a confusing mess.

    Nazis are in charge of the US government, yet there’s other Nazis on the run from the Nazis in charge? And they’re hiding bibles? I was left scratching my head wondering if there were any characters that weren’t Nazis. I guess it’s a story about how bad guys always turn on each other?

    Also The Witcher season 1 tv show. I’ve never played the games before and knew nothing about it. I was hoping the tv series would be my introduction to the games, but… what in the actual fuck. Was the director drunk? Is this a show about medieval fantasy time travel and I’m just not getting it?

  • Nemoder@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    The Cube.
    Most people saw it as an average horror movie where a bunch of people try to get out of a giant torture box. But there was a pivotal scene that stuck with me where one of the prisoners realizes he helped build part of it. The whole thing wasn’t some intentional torture device but just a bunch of people doing their day jobs that were lost in a bureaucracy not ever questioning what their work was creating.
    A stark reflection of society and the systems we create and the dangers of not ever looking at the bigger picture.

    Of course they proceeded to shit all over this idea in Cube2 where it ended up being just another evil government experiment.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Not a film, but a TV series? It’s called Jericho, and the synopsis in the Wikipedia reads:

    Jericho is an American post-apocalyptic action drama television series, which centers on the residents of the fictional city of Jericho, Kansas, in the aftermath of a nuclear attack on 23 major cities in the contiguous United States.

    But yeah, the execution is mediocre at best. Both the action and the drama are unbearably flimsy and cliche, even the argument flops as metal.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Oh man I haven’t thought of Jericho in a minute. I used to watch that after The Unit.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I love Jericho. On my third watch right now actually. Would agree that it’s frequently cliché, but overall I’d say it’s very good. Skeet Ulrich is transfixing.

  • Tabitha ☢️[she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Interstellar is like Neo-Posadism minus Marxism. The premise was awesome. Climate apocalypse and space travel. But the movie doesn’t have humanity solve either of those problems. Instead it pops it’s collar and says *don’t worry bro, the market Marxist space aliens some scientists a famous shirtless hot actor guy fuck you who cares the green guy behind a curtain made a worm hole or something".

    • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I have a feeling Chris Nolan goes into films with some specifically detailed poignant character moments in mind, and then he just hastily weaves a plot to tie them together. It’s interesting to watch at least, but maybe too high brow(?) to call entertaining

      • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        For Interstellar, at least, I’d say it’s incredibly low-brow. The resolution is just “the power of wuv saves humanity!”, which is extremely simplistic and easily understood by the masses.

        • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well I meant mostly the talking parts which we were told to care about but most people forget

  • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Not a movie, but a TV show. Revolution.

    A sci-fi post-apocalypse show where the premise is that all of a sudden all technology (specifically anything that uses electricity) just stops working and nobody knows why. The show takes place 15 years into the apocalypse. The US has Balkanized into various regional states (although you don’t learn this until later). Some regions have devolved into chaos while others have basically reverted to a steam-punk type of society. Since all modern ships use electricity, they’ve begun to revive large ships from the age of sail. The remnants of the US military at Guantanamo Bay eventually return to the mainland and try to reestablish a much more explicitly authoritarian control over the US. You eventually learn that what caused the global blackout was the creation of a self-replication nanotech which rapidly spread across the planet and shut off all electricity.

    Great premise, but it got too much into the soap-opera CW-style of writing and didn’t last more than 2 seasons.

    • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Ah yes, the Lost-likes.

      Manifest, Fast Forward, Continuum, Revolution, Terra Nova… loved them all. All of them canceled.

        • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Haha fair, that fits the definition of Lost-like, but I was thinking of that narrow era of network mystery boxes that popped up in the immediate aftermath of Lost chasing its success.

          No matter how good they were, none of them were Lost so they got canceled. (Except for Fringe thank god)

          From at least gets to live outside that shadow.

    • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yep. Sounds like what happened with Jericho. Mystery and intrigue in the starting seasons, and then just weird petty soap-opera style squabbles towards the end

      • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If the writers want to tell a story focused on inter-personal relationships, that’s perfectly fine. There are PLENTY of people who enjoy that kind of thing. They just don’t tend to be the same type of people who enjoy post-apocalyptic sci-fi puzzle-box shows. I don’t know why you go through all the trouble of creating this expansive world and lore only to focus your show on character dynamics that aren’t centered around the conceit of the show.

        If you’re going to build this complex world, let us explore that world!

  • CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    13 hours ago

    In Time (2011). Time is currency in the dystopia in the film - paying for something decreases your lifespan, earning wages increases it.

    The movie sets up a really cool class structure, wherein there are rich people born with/inheriting hundreds of thousands of years of life, and poor people barely managing to scrape enough hours to stay alive until they can earn more the next day. There are segmented areas of the city that cost years to get into.

    Overall incredible premise, but the story wasn’t exceptional beyond a couple of the cool mechanics you might expect based on said premise.

    • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      The Man From Earth is definitely one I think about. The things he must have seen, must have done, that over time shaped him into who he was. Is he the embodiment of mankind, as well as its own self-hatred? The religious stuff was a bit much. I still haven’t seen the sequel, with genuine anxiety to.

      Daybreakers is also a good one. A bit deus-ex with the “solution” at the end, but very good thought experiment

  • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Christian Bale faking an actually decent London accent, Gerard Butler being a loveable scot, and Matthew McCaughnehey doing his best Norse/Spartan Warrior impression?

    Horrible acting all around (except Bale at times), the lead female character was basically there to soothe/flirt with the lead (wish i was joking), you can barely understand anyone, and yet really impressive set/castle and overall atmosphere. You believe you are there, and that the world is gone.

    Huge gaps in logic on the hunting patterns of dragons, helicopters seem to run on infinite fuel, and the final plan to take down the main dragon is just stupid at best… but the execution of fighting dragons in the air with nets dropped by guys without parachutes was a phenomenal air sequence.

    Also, the dragon CGI holds up. You never quite see it, but when you do, you believe it’s there, and the CGI team did a great job with consistency in that the dragons are always depicted expelling fluid that they ignite, and you see it every time they cast fire.

    Brilliant movie, and one of the best opening 5 minutes in terms of origin story. Just a lot of bad acting, and some questionable feats in logic plot-wise.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The Last Jedi was an amazing deconstruction of Star Wars. I don’t think better execution would have helped it with a fan base that wants to be stuck in the past reliving the hero’s journey ad nauseam but it had a lot more potential than you see on screen.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      How Ben and Luke tell the story of how the latter nearly killed his nephew could’ve used better execution/storytelling, that alone would significantly reduce the amount of discussion on how the movie “killed his character”

    • folaht@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Disagree. The first two sequels kept making a defeated bad empire stronger and stronger without any explanation. The rebels then suddenly became just 400 to 20 people. A different type of journey would have been welcomed with open arms if clever enough.
      And I think embracing the jedi, but killing the wars aspect, rather than trying to destroy the jedi but keeping the wars it would have been a much better answer to the franchise.

    • I think I’m really unusual in that I dislike almost everything after IV. I think the first film was brilliant, back when Lucas was fighting for money and had to rely on vision and didn’t have Campbell to advise with. Introducing cutesy characters strictly for marketing, they all lacked the charm of the original.

      I know I’m an exception. Nearly everyone liked V and/or VI more. Everyone dunks on Jar Jar, but I could not stand the Ewoks. It was so disgustingly blatant.

      At the time I was dying for sequels, and when they finally came I was so disappointed. You know, I think I just realized that it was the Vader/Luke connection that sunk it for me. That all of the major characters had to be related somehow made the universe smaller, and more petty. They only got worse after that; I think I watched all of I-III, but I actively hated those.

      Anyway, I think there might have been a path, and I’m no story teller so I couldn’t fix it, but I think the while thing went off the rails after IV.

      Good friends have told me the Mandelorian was good, but “Baby Yoda” represents everything I loathed about the series and I refuse to watch it.

      Anyway, what were you saying about the Hero’s Journey? Maybe I should watch The Last Jedi, because while the Campbell formula worked for the first film, it didn’t improve any of the sequels, so maybe I’d like it. As long as there are no obviously pandering character designs that exist clearly because they can easily be marketed as toys. Looking at you, BB-8.

      • Stepos Venzny@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There are a bunch of adorable space critters that you’ll think are that when you’re watching the movie, and they certainly were marketed and merchandised like crazy, but they’re actually there due to the unwanted presence of adorable Earth critters during filming. They couldn’t shoot the scenes without including these birds that lived where they were shooting so the solution they came up with was CGI-ing weird faces on them and including some close-ups to make them look deliberate.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m also pro-TLJ, but I do think it could have done with a few tweaks to the script to catch some stuff. In terms of how it looked and was acted on the moment-to-moment scale they nailed it though, so I’m not sure if that falls under “better execution”

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          True, but I would argue that TLJ actually did substantially better than the Disney and Star Wars averages on the visual front. Not necessarily in terms of the technical execution of the effects since they’re always basically as good as they get for the time in both Disney and Star Wars stuff, but in terms of the composition of shots

      • metaStatic@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Rian Johnson is a master of deconstructing genres.

        if you went this long without watching it I won’t spoil it but to say the themes are not typical of the rest of the franchise and the fans hated it for that.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What was that anime where you wear a VR headset and if you die in-game, you die in real life?

    Ya that one

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Mutant Chronicles, except i don’t think about it normally, but immediately comes to mind when somebody asks similar question. Also it wasn’t mediocre, it was incredibly bad and the second biggest disapointment movie ever for me (worst was Starship Troopers 2).

    • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Premise seems pretty cool (mutant/zombie machine), and I guess it’s kind of a cool but forgettable action flick?

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I played a lot of tabletop and card games in this universe in 90’s so i was pretty excited for a movie, and while it was forgettable (but also bad) action flick its main fault was that it has basically nothing in common with the Mutant Chronicles universe.

        It’s like getting “Lord of the RIngs” movie, but about some gang war in a village southeast of Umbar.

        • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It’s like getting “Lord of the RIngs” movie, but about some gang war in a village southeast of Umbar.

          I mean. I would watch that.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            In this case i would like to recommend some books for you:

            1. The Last Ringbearer by Kirill Yeskov
            2. Ring of Darkness series by Nik Perumov

            Basically unlicenced Middleearth fanfics written by Russian authors but a good ones and getting officially published in multiple countries.

  • folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The live action transformers movies.
    Although I almost never think about it.
    And I only saw the first thirty minutes of the first movie.

    • I watched it until the Megan Fox car breakdown scene and figured it wouldn’t get better than that and stopped there. I don’t remember anything else from the movie.

      I admit that it surprised me it did well enough for sequels, when better films didn’t, but I guess that’s The Public for you.

      • folaht@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It didn’t. I managed to stay until one of the autobots had to take a leak. I was too insulted at that point. Megan Fox came across as an absolute bore, but of course the guy has to stammer and stumble and try to impress the dead weight.