cringe

  • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    And erotic books, as absurd as it may seem, are categorized the same as pornography.

    Why would that be absurd? If it’s 1) some form of media, and 2) meant mainly for sexual gratification, it’s porn. Like that’s the literal definition.

      • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Yes, but the exploitative aspect is only one of the arguments against pornography. There is also the argument that it atomizes and alienates people from each other by allowing effortless consumption of sexual gratification instead of having sex with another person, and that will apply no matter the medium.

        • Frivolous_Beatnik [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          8 days ago

          Okay? Now it doesn’t matter what I think obv but IMO it’s weird to have a government enforce laws & prohibitions that in effect say “hey queers, you’re not allowed to fantasize about this, find someone to fuck idk”. Legislating to fight the exploitative nature of esp. live pornography? Cool, good. Legislating against this nebulous sense of atomization from personally consumed fiction…?

          • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            Don’t get me wrong, I’m not in favor of it, and in fact I have a fairly recent post history arguing against it, but I’m paraphrasing arguments I’ve seen others make and upvote here on Hexbear.