• hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    2 meters error (assuming it means radius of 2 meters) is like my whole living room lol. This kind of sounds like “well the research went nowhere but the thesis to be submitted”

        • tocopherol [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have a smart light that interacts with wifi, add one more and you could use them to triangulate at least a rough position possibly. Enough to tell if someone is in the house at least and maybe an estimate of how many people. Sci-fi dystopia shit really if it is truly possible.

      • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        if i read skimmed through correctly, nodes in that case are basically wireless devices (so iot perverts + phones/watches/audio/tv).

        • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          so the opsec here doesn’t really change much. prefer wired whenever possible and don’t fill your house with iot. how useful is this method if the person they want to track only has two broadcasters (their router and their phone)?

      • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Whether they’re in their house or not is all that’s really needed for any monitoring purposes I can think of.

        Of course, if you’ve compromised their 6 damn wireless nodes, you also know that they’re home when their phone switches to wifi.