While photovoltaics (PV) play an increasingly central role in Europe’s clean energy transition and energy independence, a hidden vulnerability threatens this progress: the software-based remote access to inverters, the critical “brains” of any PV system.

“Today, over 200 GW of European PV capacity is already linked to inverters manufactured in China – the equivalent of more than 200 nuclear power plants,” said Christoph Podewils, the European Solar Manufacturing Council (ESMC) Secretary General.

“This means Europe has effectively surrendered remote control of a vast portion of its electricity infrastructure.”

[…]

Further concerns include:

  • 70% of all inverters installed in 2023 came from Chinese vendors, mainly Huawei and SunGrow.
  • These two companies alone already control remote access to 168 GW of PV capacity in Europe (DNV Report, p. 40), by 2030, this figure is projected to exceed 400 GW – comparable to the output of 150–200 nuclear power plants.
  • One of these vendors [China’s Huawei] is already banned from the 5G sector in many countries and is currently under investigation in Belgium for bribery and corruption.

[…]

In light of these findings, the ESMC calls for the immediate development of an EU “Inverter Security Toolbox”, modeled after the successful 5G Security Toolbox. This would involve:

  • A comprehensive risk assessment of inverter manufacturers.
  • A requirement that high-risk vendors must not be permitted to maintain an online connection to European electricity systems.
  • Consideration of outright bans for such vendors from connecting to the grid.
  • A replication of Lithuania’s proactive legislation – banning inverters from China – across all EU Member States – ensuring security measures apply to PV systems of all sizes.
  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    26 days ago

    Here’s an idea: instead, ban devices that do not function without an internet connection. Devices are not “smart” when you have no sovereignty over them.

    • varyingExpertise@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Absolutely this. I have limited experience with the whole home automation market, but I find the Shelly model to be perfect: Local access via BLE or LAN ist always enabled out of the box, cloud (run by Shelly) requires a checkbox to be activated.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    high-risk, non-European manufacturers – most notably from China.

    We want nobody to buy these devices directly from china!

    Because we want you to buy these chinese devices from us! With our beautiful stickers on the hood!!

      • varyingExpertise@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Yep, and I paid the premium for a Fronius one and so far, apart from their customer service being clearly oriented towards the chain “customer -> installer -> Fronius” I am pretty happy with it.

        They are staying on top of things with their software updates, provide proper changelogs and API documentation and features like emergency offgrid power have improved over the period of my ownership. It was okay with a switchover time of about 60 seconds of no power from and to the grid when I bought the thing, and the last time emergency power triggered, the switchover to local took only about 12 seconds and switching back was seamless with my UPSes not even triggering. I would recommend them.