• ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.netBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So you’re happy with a system that will revert to capitalism, your quibble is just over whether it’s taken apart by internal or external forces. Yeah, real coherent ideology you got there.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m not happy with a system that will revert to capitalism at all. I just think the material conditions are not always the same where anarchists won’t come ahead against the counter-revolution, and when they do, they won’t collapse through their own internal contradictions like ML regimes.

      • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.netBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        So AES states prove that socialist states always collapse and becomes capitalism, and the collapse of every anarchist state ever to outside of forces doesn’t prove that anarchist states are incapable of defending themselves? I have that right? And that makes sense to you?