(Source. Spotted here. For the context wherein Trump applied the stereotype, see here.)

Remember: words like ‘intifada’, phrases like ‘from the river to the sea’, and even stuffed animals in the form of octopodes are all ways of secretly calling for another Shoah, no matter how many times Palestinians say otherwise. On the other hand, when a Herzlian like Trump applies an infamous stereotype to somebody…

  • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I feel like these chickens are gonna come home to roost eventually. Rising antisemitism is real among right-wingers, and it’s easy to see how chuds could believe “Jews control the media” narratives when every politician ever is seemingly bending over backwards to serve Israel. Many “America First” chuds are upset that their guys are prioritizing a foreign country over their own.

    There’s gonna come a turning point where the Zionist entity falls or support is no longer beneficial to the US, at that point right-wing figures will no longer pretend to care about antisemitism and I fear all hell will break loose for Jews in the West.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I’d argue the blowback is very real for antizionist (and even nonzionist) Jews. Zionist Jews made something of a Faustian bargain where they’d be allowed a voice and a platform in AmeriKKKa at the expense of every other Jew that feels negatively towards Israel. Effectively, they’ve created an acceptable way to be Jewish, like how white supremacists hold East Asians as “model minorities” for everyone else to emulate (or else).

      Looking at how antizionist Jews are currently treated, it’s hard to say how much of this only exists as a subconscious phenomenon and how much is already material.

          • OnceUponATimeInWeHo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            I guess I’m confused about how that’s distinct from anti Zionism. Wikipedia says they support Jewish settlement in Palestine but won’t come on aliyah? Sounds like Zionism with extra steps

            • Maturin [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              19 hours ago

              There is not a really clear line between “non-Zionist” and “anti-Zionist” but, with Zionism being a political ideology and Judaism being a religion, a “non-Zionist Jew” could be used to describe a member of the Jewish religion whose Jewish identity and religious belief does not involve any Zionism while an “anti-Zionist Jew” is a Jewish person who takes an affirmative political or ideological stance against Zionism. And of course there would be significant overlap between the two.

              • OnceUponATimeInWeHo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                19 hours ago

                So “opposition to Israel” would be antizionist (including non Zionist anti Zionists), but those who solely identify as nonzionist would, to me, fall in the “neither for or against” ethnostate fencesitting.

                • Maturin [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  I think opposition to Israel - as in “Israel should not exist as a “Jewish State”” - is anti-Zionism. I think “fence sitting” could be a bit harsh on non-Zionists if applied to all of them. “Israel has nothing to do with me and I have nothing to do with Israel why are you even asking me about it?” could be an example of a legitimate non-Zionist position that is not fence sitting (especially outside of the US, where your other status as a US tax-payer puts you back squarely in the middle of the issue).

                  As an illustration, if a person from, say, Honduras said “I don’t understand the Russia/Ukraine thing, it has nothing to do with me, it is on the other side of the world” would you say they are “fence sitting”? Even if their great-great-great-great grandfather was Ukrainian?

                  I think the point I’m trying to make about non-Zionist Jews is that there is no affirmative obligation for someone to be involved in or have a deep understanding of the politics and ideology of Zionism solely because they are Jewish. In the US, UK, and Palestine, not having a position on that becomes harder to justify, not because of one’s Jewishness but because of one’s participation in the political system that supports Zionism.

                  • OnceUponATimeInWeHo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    Maybe I’m blinded by the western positionality, but dusting your hands and saying “nothing to do with me” re the apartheid state that’s doing the genocide in the name of your religion does seem like fencesitting. Obviously Israel is lying and weaponizing Judaism, but declaring yourself non-Zionist seems to opt out of the argument entirely

    • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      21 hours ago

      There is bleed-over of this into liberal/baby left spaces as well, starting with the “Israel dictates to America, actually” theory. This is just one step removed from an antisemitic conspiracy theory. At its base is just confused liberalism, but by getting the nature of the relationship reversed they remove blame and action from the dominant partner, the country in which most of these people live and could take action, and replace it with a far away enemy that is controlling “us”, with the main “action” being to spread this idea and nothing more.

      • Lussy [any, hy/hym]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        OK, yes, but also Israel and Israelis must be held accountable for their their inhumane cruelty.

        It is not antisemitic to say that while Israel does the US bidding, their methods on the ground are distinctly evil.