Socdem is bad because capitalism etc etc I understand that, but I saw some people in here saying that socdem is OBJECTIVELY the moderate branch of fascism, which I don’t really understand, because most socdems I know just want their basic welfare system, but are far from nationalism, advocating for genocide etc
I know it’s still bad but for example in spain I feel there’s a big difference between the francoist spain and the socdem wannabe spain, for the better
So please explain, and feel free to call out any brainworms that I might (probably) have shown in here
This could also just be a very funny line, like the “unlimited genocide on the first world” thing, idk
It seems to me that their reasoning makes sense… Maybe he changed opinion because communists couldn’t afford to lose allies against the impending fascist threat? I think it was more the exception than the rule, maybe I’m wrong…
Stalin maintained the need for a popular front after the end of ww2. Capitalists are also a threat.