It’s easier and nicer. But it’s also shitty because of what you mentioned.

The thing is, that’s how it’s going to stay unless people stop using it. You can get this info you mentioned somewhere else, or simply don’t need it, as I said, yes it’s harder and less nice to live without it, but it’s not like you can’t live without live traffic data or whatever. Start using CoMaps, contribute to open street map, leave reviews on other review aggregators, etc etc

Magenta
Yellow
Cyan
Cyan
Magenta

You are indeed free to think about me whatever you like :)

👍❤️

Basically all I’m saying is that your last sentence does not help to prove your credibility. You said it in a way as if it was meant to make people believe in what you’re saying, as if it gave weight to the point that you made.

I’m just letting you know that at least for me, it had the opposite effect. I’m not arguing with the rest of your comment.

❤️

You seem to have misunderstood me completely. I’m only doubting their expertise on this topic, not their career choice.

I’m not saying you did any evil, just that your expertise on this topic is based on corporate ideals which likely aren’t compatible with actually good ideals.

My statement was not meant to be any commentary about you as a person.

I’ve been a community manager and a marketing manager for a few companies you would know.

This statement gives you negative credit in my opinion, i.e. one should actively mistrust what you’re saying on this topic.

It’s a bit ridiculous to me why you’d think that we’d be the last humans to exist. Habitable zones will keep existing after climate change kills 99% of the population. Even full-scale nuclear war will leave most dead, but not all.

The remainder will probably keep reproducing and survive. Even 0.001% of our current population would likely mean humanity would continue.

What else do you think would make humanity 100% extinct?