Yes, but I don’t see why he chose him. There was so little information made public about the case that it was bound to backfire of it didn’t turn out the way he hoped. But I guess the grift is hard when you no longer have the backing of the entire conservative media circuit.

Can someone explain to me why he’s doing this? Were the victims black, hispanic, or some other demographic that conservatives think white people should get to legally hunt, is it simply because the suspect is a white man, or is he only doing this to create controversy and get some ad revenue/stay relevant?

The news articles I found published prior to Rittenhouse’s video had very little information, and the victim wasn’t even named. Why is Rittenhouse so sure Michael Rediker had to defend himself against “3 violent attackers” (which I’m going to assume were the victim, his wife, and one of their children)?

I think this is in Japan, where heated toilet seats are common. I know toilet seats are designed not to harbor bacteria, but I’d get so paranoid and want to give those cats a bath for sitting on it, so it’s no surprise they’re plotting against me.

I hope her post is a joke, because there’s a great business idea hidden in there that she hasn’t noticed. She could have marketed it as a cuckoldry/findom experience. Guys will pay her good money to see her leave them for someone else and then order food (with 100% tip of course) knowing that all the profits will be going to the woman who just humiliated them.

If they really were that based, at least 10% of the country would be in prison, and I would have kidnapped Graham Linehan and sailed to Ireland so he could face justice in his homeland.

I’m not sure if they said, but probably because it was legally indefensible. You can fool the public with fake articles, but it’s much harder to fool a judge.

But as always, they gloss over the fact that he wasn’t fired simply because he was transphobic. He was clearly being disruptive and harrassing other teachers, and then turned his disciplinary hearing into a protest.

Only in his dreams.

Yes, but because he has no intention of following them, the protect children crowd now expect the courts to drop the orders.

Trans ideology is when you don’t let people trespass in schools.

This is even more ridiculous than most. Even when they lie about the reasons for these cases, the consequences (getting fired or arrested etc) are generally true. But nothing is actually true here, and the screenshot of the “article” immediately looks suspect because it doesn’t have the logo for the outlet or the name of an author. It looks like something someone could have easily fabricated.

Sure, but I think if your first instinct is that something this outlandish is unbelievable, it’s probably because it isn’t true

This Linked In post is my favourite. Someone calls it unbelievable, then is surprised the unbelievable thing is actually unbelievable.

I’ve always found RPG’s more immersive when the MC has no dialogue other than the lines you choose. It lowers the chances that anything they say will misalign with the way you’re role-playing the character.

I liked Dragon Age The Veilguard a lot more than most people, but there was a point where your Rook makes a bunch of dad jokes about an Elven hand statue in found in Arlathan, I would never RP as someone who makes the tamest, most milquetoast of dad jokes.

Someone needs to infiltrate their spaces and tell them they’re all a bunch of woke progressives if they play anything other than Night Trap or Sewer Shark.

Does that mean all the retro games created before storage technologies and audio quality became good enough to include voice acting are woke? And I guess Sega CD era FMV games are the height of anti-woke gaming.

Japan has a concept of “host hair”, which Kiryu doesn’t have. So to answer your question, capitalism is the reason he can’t get a job at a host club.

Hosts generally have a particular look similar to K-pop idols, but often with elaborate, layered hairstyles.

I only have kinks grounded in revolutionary theory, and all your kinks are kinks.

This is what makes me think it might be AI. It could be Christian purity culture, but auth right has a long history of being against “sexual immorality” as part of their supremecist beliefs. It might even be a dog whistle for “racial” purity. But I tell you what it isn’t. It’s definitely not the right to have pure and untainted food. The “lib” right is all for bumping up the sawdust content until market forces tell them otherwise.