The truth is that NATO should be dissolved
- 2 Posts
- 18 Comments
Very well. Since privacy is irrelevant, give me your full name and address. I promise I won’t report you to ICE.
If you think you can organize a resistance to fascism while being surveilled 24/7, be my guest. The only thing you’re doing by being a stupid doomer is discouraging people from taking proactive steps towards better privacy. Surveillance is what kills our freedom of speech, assembly, and petition.
It’s funny how much people deny that privacy is the foundation of freedom when every tyrant knows it. That’s why they set up surveillance systems.
No, the state can’t just do that. They could do it to any one person, but not to everyone. Consider this hypothetical: the state wants to kill 100 people. If everyone is outside, this job becomes easy. If everyone is in their homes, this job becomes harder. Why? Because breaking down doors, moving equipment, etc. costs money. And government agencies don’t have all the money in the world! They can’t:
- Go after every single person who uses cash
- Go after everyone who uses a vpn
- Go after everyone who uses encrypted messaging
- Go after everyone who attends a protest and who wears a mask and puts their phone in a faraday bag.
Privacy works best in a larger group. Telling people privacy is dead actually hurts you more than telling people that there are indeed effective steps you can take to protect yourself.
Encryption requires no respect from the State
Keeping your google account can be helpful if you want to follow this strategy:
- Register on Signal using your phone number
- Port your phone number to google voice ($20 transfer fee but free after that; additionally while its privacy sucks, google is great for security)
- Change the settings so that every caller is sent to voice mail
- Use mysudo and cloaked for VoIP numbers
- Set up Signal on a new device (ideally a grapheneos pixel)
- Use a calyx institute hotspot for data or buy a sim card with cash
Socialists need to learn to stop being dogmatic. If a Marxist-Leninist revolution is our most viable solution, democratic socialists et al should back it. If democratic socialism is more likely to succeed, Marxist-Leninists should back it.
Your number one step is privacy. Privacy is the foundation of freedom; it “protects the right to be left alone”.
If you’re a beginner, Naomi Brockwell’s videos have very good tips. If you’re not a beginner, read Michael Bazzell’s book Extreme Privacy. Read it in full and decide the level of privacy you want (you likely will not need every single one of his tips).
No, don’t use Telegram. Chats aren’t end to end encrypted by default, you have to specifically request a secret conversation. It’s also not possible to encrypt group chats on telegram. Matrix, signal, session, simplex, and many others are much better.
Yes, people should have that, but it’s not that simple. Some liberals, particularly classical liberals, think a free market would bring those things to everyone. I don’t necessarily disagree, though I think free markets can only ever be free under communism/socialism, not capitalism. The issue with centrally planned, universal healthcare is that a hostile government could refuse to provide you care, much like insurance companies that don’t approve coverage for many things. Additionally, there needs to be strong medical privacy protections.
WindAqueduct@lemmy.mlto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Does anyone have a Faraday bag for phone that works?1·13 days agoUse an SLNT bag
WindAqueduct@lemmy.mlto Privacy@lemmy.ml•No phone passcode privacy expectation in police station, New Jersey appeals court rules51·13 days agoJust when will my human rights, which are grounded in the constitution, stop being put aside by bullshit rulings ad absurdum
Also, this is why you should use a privacy screen.
WindAqueduct@lemmy.mlOPto Privacy@lemmy.ml•The P in HIPAA stands for portability, not privacy1·19 days agoHere’s a script you can send to your state legislators and governor:
I demand a state medical privacy law at least as strong as the Minnesota Health Records Act (Minnesota Statutes 144.291-.298). Here are seven types of disclosures that HIPAA permits without patient consent or knowledge, but which generally require patient consent in Minnesota:
- Disclosures of health information for treatment purposes, unless consent is not possible due to a medical emergency.
- Disclosures of health information to other providers for healthcare operations purposes. [Note: healthcare operations includes over 60 nonclinical activities, including business activities. According to Federal Register, Vol. 75, No. 134, July 14, 2010 (see pages 40872, 40906, 40907, 40911), your medical data can be shared with over 2.2 million entities, including 1.5 million business associates, without your consent or knowledge.]
- Disclosures of health information to payers for payment purposes.
- Disclosures of health information to outside researchers for medical research purposes. [That’s right, non-consensual medical research is explicitly allowed by HIPAA, but greatly limited in Minnesota.]
- Consent of a patient’s authorized family or legal representative for disclosures of health information to funeral directors.
- Disclosures of health information for military or national security purposes unless the disclosure is specifically required by federal law.
- Disclosures of health information for law enforcement purposes, unless the disclosure is in response to a valid court order or warrant. [That’s right, under HIPAA, medical providors are permitted to share sensitive health data without a warrant.]
Source: Mayo Clinic’s Notice of Privacy Practices (link: https://www.primarycareondemand.mayoclinic.org/notice-privacy-practices)
Minnesota is the only state to have a comprehensive medical privacy law stronger than HIPAA. [State] should be the second.
You’re daft if you think its something anyone cares about after 20 years of implementation.
The reason it’s taken 20 years to implement (and actually, it still hasn’t technically been implemented, since we’re still in the initial enforcement stage) is because people cared and still do.
Yeah, I’ve heard that from other people as well. What you should do: if you live in Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Texas, or Wyoming, you can only get a real id. Contact your state legislators and governor to demand a state id. If you don’t live in those states, specifically request a state id and only bring what you need for a state id. In Illinois for example, you can prevent a real id from being issued to you by mistake by bringing only 1 proof of address instead of 2.
“are far from the worst they can do”
I beg to differ. First, you should know there are plans to make real ids digital, possibly placed on your phone, and real-time and remotely accessible according to AAMVA testimony: https://docs.house.gov/meetings/HM/HM07/20231205/116640/HHRG-118-HM07-Wstate-GrossmanI-20231205.pdf
Now suppose that real ids are digital and required for medical care. Now, what’s gonna happen if you say something, or attend a protest etc., that the government or corporations don’t like? Well, in real time you will be denied your real id and consequently be unable to receive medical care.
This won’t happen today or even this decade. Right now they’re laying the groundwork for implementing this in maybe 20 years. That’s why we must fight back NOW.
WindAqueduct@lemmy.mlto Privacy@lemmy.ml•We caught companies making it harder to delete your personal data online4·21 days agoPurchase a california virtual mailbox/pmb service
Something to note: In Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Texas, and Wyoming, you can only get a Real ID. If you live in one of these states, please contact your state senator, representative, and governor to express your concerns and demand a state id.
Also, everyone should contact their members of congress and the president, and demand that the real id act be repealed.
They’re gonna put ads in our dreams