I think you may be confused, partially because the article is written in a confusing way. It says Newsom condemns ordinances that prohibit homelessness without adequate shelter. This is a strange thing to write shortly after mentioning that he supports a recent supreme court ruling that allows ordinances that prohibit homelessness without adequate shelter. The article says that this is in keeping with a years long effort to get homeless people into shelters, but mentions nothing about any state support for building shelters. It does mention spending billions of dollars to clear homeless encampments, maybe in the hope you’ll assume this includes providing adequate services and shelter. It mentions an ordinance that targets homeless people who refuse shelter, but makes no mention of if the shelter being offered is adequate (one instance comes to mind where homeless people were offered one week of shelter if they gave up all their possessions. Reporting simply mentioned that only 8 percent accepted offers of shelter).
The way corporate news reports on homeless people is systematically dehumanizing and frankly genocidal.
Also: fuck Gavin Newsom. I hope a piano falls on him while he is walking down the street.
They discovered it as part of their job. My partner works in healthcare and they say you get used to these aspects of the job. And look, I’m in favor of setting up a mouse-trap-the-game style contraption that results in a giant anvil falling on Joe Biden’s head because he’s a genocidal maniac, but I honestly think he’s probably a genocidal maniac that’s pleasant to be around. All this to say the worker probably had an average time of it.