I didn’t say that, how do people read that into my comment? I was giving additional context that it is not enough to bring it anywhere into the country. Sure, keeping it in London is worse, I never said it’s better.
Many anti-colonial activists will point out that the modern day governments are the collaborators from back then and still they get the reparations and artifacts. Sure, keeping them in London is worse, I never defended that.
Many ethnic minorities complain that their cultural heritage is exhibitioned in the capital far away. Countries are a social construct
Pretty sure this isn’t a cinnamon stick but a regular stick and neither is it a dog but a tiger
Change the diet for the climate, eat the rich *clap* *clap*
Who says this is about collecting?
The two Never Agains:
Never again to us and
Never again to anyone
“The Left is divided but you’re not part of it”
That’s not how evolution works. Why would they be surprised if that’s always been their destiny? Were you surprised when humans gained human level intelligence?
“I liked star trek before it gone woke. I mean a black captain, a female who used to be a male, and a former terrorist on the bridge? Give it a break! What’s next? A Russian and a Japanese working together with Americans and Scots? A Frenchman with a British accent who drinks Earl Gray? C’mon!”
I never said it’s better to keep it but it’s not enough to bring it somewhere in the country. Countries are a social construct so instead of focusing on boarders, bring it directly to the cultural heirs. Of cause keeping it is worse. If the capital is too far away, why would London be better?