That would be a good thing in the sense that they’d be pissing off companies with billions in revenue at stake (well, Take Two, at least) and therefore both the incentive and the resources to fight back, no? Of course, that could easily mean said companies getting carve-outs established for themselves rather than actually changing the underlying policy, but y’know.
That would be a good thing in the sense that they’d be pissing off companies with billions in revenue at stake (well, Take Two, at least) and therefore both the incentive and the resources to fight back, no? Of course, that could easily mean said companies getting carve-outs established for themselves rather than actually changing the underlying policy, but y’know.