• AernaLingus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    That would be a good thing in the sense that they’d be pissing off companies with billions in revenue at stake (well, Take Two, at least) and therefore both the incentive and the resources to fight back, no? Of course, that could easily mean said companies getting carve-outs established for themselves rather than actually changing the underlying policy, but y’know.

    • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 days ago

      geordi-no commies thinking china will end dollar hegemony

      geordi-yes take two making new crypto payment processor to sell gta6 and imploding dollar

  • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 days ago

    I really haven’t been paying attention, can someone eli5 this whole situation with adult content and gatekeeping that’s going on. I know about what the UK is doing but now it’s coming to the USA? It’s to stop kids from seeing lgbtq content right? Just papered over with “protecting kids”?

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      6 days ago

      The world has enabled a monopoly on payment processing and as a result Mastercard and visa hold the keys to censorship in various domains. If they refuse to do business with your company because it’s too naughty you are basically locked out of receiving funds and starved from doing any commerce. All mastercard has to do is add you to their match database and you’re blacklisted from accepting credit cards from all vendors their partnered with, which is basically everyone in the fucking world

      They should be limited to only denying things that are actually illegal like child pornography and drug trafficking since they are a pseudo government entity. But since they are a private business they instead are not content agnostic and refuse to do business with objectionable content that is legal but otherwise toxic to be associated with from a business perspective.

      It’s the cloudflare vs tier 1 internet provider argument, basically. A tier 1 internet provider is basically a utility and content agnostic. That’s why they will route to disgusting content like kiwi farms, 8chan (when it had a website), etc. because unless there is a court order saying otherwise they have to show that content. But cloudflare, which controls access to a significant portion of the internet (like 50+% at this point), is privatized, and can decide they dislike a site or more likely that supporting it is toxic to the brand, and abandon it leaving it to get ddosed offline. No one cared when this happened to those right wing shitholes because they’re garbage but when the needle swings (like now) and left wing media gets targeted the precedent has been set that it is fine for them do to this.

      Mastercard and visa (and paypal) have similarly done this before. They have taken small businesses and websites down numerous times because they do not want to be associated with controversial content. Sometimes it’s right wing nutjobs but it’s also kink stuff a lot of the time. It wasn’t really publicized before though.

    • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 days ago

      my understanding is that this actually originates with an Australian christian group. their tactic consists of 1) targeting payment processors as a means of “going over the heads” of vendors so to speak and 2) start with content that most ordinary people would agree is objectionable (we’re talking real CW i don’t want to type that out stuff) and then 3) hope that lets you expand to much broader cultural censorship of much more popular media.

      always papered over with “protecting kids” of course. these are the kinds of people that would say they’re performing the Holocaust on behalf of the kids.

        • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          6 days ago

          two important things here: they did quite a bit to masquerade as a secular action group and not a religious moralist group; it is actually quite unclear from anything i can find why exactly the payment processors caved so easily. its actual clients, itch.io and steam, dispute the claim that the listed games constitute illegal content. i’m not sure what exactly convinced them to side with this group. their website does not seem to lay out any particular action they’re inciting like mass call-ins to the company headquarters or something annoying like that.

        • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          6 days ago

          Apparently they use methods that target the boomer CEO executives e.g phone calls and mails. This seems to be quite more effective at getting noticed than social media campaigns that end up being filtered by some shit department before it ever reaches the top.

    • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 days ago

      back-to-me-shining credit card companies are deciding unilaterally where money can and can’t go in the economy, now making moral decisions with online game distribution platforms

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      If you told me in 2009 that most of my hobby community would line up with evangelical pearl clutchers and soccer moms under “gamergate” I would have laughed.

      And the gaming community is going to still stay loyal to the Jack Thompson demographic like the lapdogs they are.

  • Hohsia [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    At this point, aren’t we just emulating everything we used to do irl? Like you always had to show your ID for M rated games to prove you were above eighteen

    The difference of course is that we are under a collective delusion that the transition from digital to physical is 1-1 😃

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    I guess it’s fine that first they came for the Gooners, because I am not a Gooner.

    Now they’re coming for the Gamers and it is also fine because I am not a Gamer.

    I can’t remember what’ll happen next, but it’s probably fine.