All i know about pathfinder is that apparently the first edition had a lot of kink stuff in it, and some very explicit bestiality stuff.
I don’t even know if its true, a friend who is into tabletop stuff told me.
Early PF was a spinoff of 3.5 and the thing about 3.5 was they were letting fucking anyone write books for it which PF inherited. I don’t know if it’s explicitly any freakier than 3.5 having books on which species could interbreed and what different species breast milk tasted like
All i know about pathfinder is that apparently the first edition had a lot of kink stuff in it, and some very explicit bestiality stuff. I don’t even know if its true, a friend who is into tabletop stuff told me.
Early PF was a spinoff of 3.5 and the thing about 3.5 was they were letting fucking anyone write books for it which PF inherited. I don’t know if it’s explicitly any freakier than 3.5 having books on which species could interbreed and what different species breast milk tasted like
The worst you can say about early Pathfinder is that they really wanted to stand out from D&D, so everything was just maximalized
Ogres weren’t just maneaters, they were also incestuous sex predators
There’s not just one evil nation of slavers, but several and slavery is even in some of the “good” nations
Goblins weren’t just nasty little level one fodder, they were violent little firestarters
I don’t know where beastiality comes in, unless they’re just upset that they had catfolk, gnolls, and ratfolk stuff in there
Pretty sure it was Lamashtu who had the bestiality stuff, they drew heavily on the source material when designing her.
Even so, I don’t recall any actual animal fucking
Just a lot of weird rituals and giving birth to monsters after drinking cursed water
[obvious CW] Unfortunately they made an item that facilitates it.