10 years after the Supreme Court extended marriage rights to all same-sex couples, it will consider whether to take a case asking it to overturn the decision.
I really think you could get them to reneg on the “money as a form of speech” thing if you made the case that, say, you were just “talking” to Cubans or sex-workers or one of the other myriad ways your not actually allowed to use money as US citizen.
Nah, the courts only go more fascist now that the fascists have a majority, never less.
You’re probably right. I still think it would be worth a try. They wouldn’t be judges, wouldn’t have gone into law if they were 100% cynical actors, if they didn’t in their own way believe in the system as it purports to operate.
They wouldn’t be judges, wouldn’t have gone into law if they were 100% cynical actors, if they didn’t in their own way believe in the system as it purports to operate
Nah, the courts only go more fascist now that the fascists have a majority, never less.
You’re probably right. I still think it would be worth a try. They wouldn’t be judges, wouldn’t have gone into law if they were 100% cynical actors, if they didn’t in their own way believe in the system as it purports to operate.
even the libs are vain powermongers