• fox [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 days ago

    What if the US pours another ten billion dollars into making two planes and a battleship? They’re loaded to the gills with wunderwaffen designed by six companies, manufactured in eighteen different states and assembled in another twelve.

      • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The F-35s didn’t “fall into the Red Sea”, no idea where you’re getting that from.

        The F-35 very effective platform, which is exactly why China is making their own version, the J-35. Which China will, as they should, proudly show off during the military parade. This is a major accomplishment for China. The technology that goes into building such an aircraft is incomprehensible to most, and China has accomplished this. Europe hasn’t, Russia hasn’t, but China has.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I’ve found two examples of F-35’s falling off of aircraft carriers, actually.

          One in January fell into the Red Sea, and it looks like the British lost one in 2021?

          • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Those were F/A-18s, not F-35s, with regards to Red Sea incidents. Three F/A-18s were lost, one to friendly fire, one fell of the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier while under evasive maneuvers, and one had an arrestor hook failure. All of this occured while under fire from the Ansarallah/Houthis.

            The F-35C “lost in January”, was in January of 2022, on the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier in the South China Sea.

            The UK has lost F-35Bs, the vertical/short take off and landing version, from their smaller aircraft carriers, in the Mediterranean.

            Via incident rates, the F-35 is safer and has had less incidents than the 4th generation aircraft it replaces. A lot of people don’t know this, but the “media darling” F-14 Tomcat that everyone thinks is the greatest thing ever because of Top Gun, had it’s first loss on it’s second ever flight.

            The F-35, the more you look into it, is a technological marvel, which is why China is proceeding to incorporate a lot of the features from the F-35 into it’s own aircraft, like the latest J-20S model and the J-35, a Chinese F-35 analogue. The technology works and I find it silly to make fun of it. China wouldn’t be spending billions on the J-20S and making the J-35 over the past decade plus, if they thought it was useless.

            People in the Russian information space just dislike the F-35 because Russia cannot make an equivalent, so anything Russia doesn’t have = useless to them. Same with aircraft carriers, something that people in the Russian information space claim is useless, while China is just about to unveil a new aircraft carrier.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              Oop, yeah, that’s what I get for skimming.

              Although the one the Brits lost was in the Mediterranean, a separate incident from the one in the South China Sea.