Charlie Kirk has never received a warm welcome in the pages of this magazine. It doesn’t matter now. The assassination of Kirk is a tragedy. Morally, it is unjustifiable. Politically, it is cause for serious alarm. A larger spiral into political violence would be a catastrophe for the Left.
As of the time of this writing, no one knows the shooter’s ideology or motivations. But some key points are clear enough.
No one should be killed as punishment for political expression, no matter how objectionable. In addition to our basic abhorrence of violence, we are also proponents of democracy, which depends on free speech and open inquiry. Without them, collective self-governance is impossible and tyranny becomes inevitable. Imposing silence on political opponents by brute force, whether in the form of state crackdowns on dissent or lone-wolf assassinations of leaders, undermines a principle that democratic socialists have always held dear.
I just escalate these talking points to the stratosphere as soon as I hear them. “Oh, so given the opportunity you wouldn’t kill Hitler in 1930? When would it be okay? '33 when the concentration camps open? '38 with the forced annexation of the sudetenland? '39 with the invasion of Poland?”
I’m sure a lib would still say ”violence is never the answer”
“You just call anyone you don’t like a nazi, and that’s why the left keeps losing”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvgZtdmyKlI
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: