https://x.com/MattMorseTV/status/1968762329555747279

Bio:

Father, Husband, American Chauvinist. 🇺🇸

More highlights from this guy (racism and transphobia):



I’m at max images but had to include this too:

To the left: Silence is Violence.

You must wholeheartedly and unconditionally denounce Charlie Kirk’s assassination or you are complicit in the violence.


They spent 2 days celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death and giving justifications as to why he deserved it.

I will never forget that.


One of his recent tweets is just him calling someone a slur

He’s some chud youtuber with 600k subs, guess what his pfp is:

  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anyone who says their IQ is over 200 is betraying that they are mathematically dull, and don’t understand either IQ or the math it’s based on.

    Every 15 IQ points corresponds to 1 standard deviation. To be 6 standard deviations above average (IQ 190), you would have to be one in 500 million, or demonstrably one of the 16 most “intelligent” people on Earth. To have an IQ of 197, you would need to be the most “intelligent” among 10 billion people, and there aren’t that many people in existence.

    There are lots of suckers who can only comprehend linear functions, and I’m totally in favor of them supporting trans-owned businesses (though that story is obviously a fabrication, just like everything else).

    • pinkapple@lemmy.mlBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      And you would need an even more comically high population for that result to be above standard error. With only earth’s entire population, getting 200 is far more likely to achieve by doing the test completely randomly than by reflecting some true superhuman ability. It’s also non-standard and equivalent with saying that an IQ of 1 is definable or meaningful.

      • ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        saying that an IQ of 1 is definable or meaningful.

        To be fair, these people also usually think single digit IQ at least abstractly has a well-defined meaning, and that’s before getting into the problems with IQ tests themselves (such as the Flynn effect, cultural-specific assumptions underlying the test, racism, etc.)