https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/talks-could-have-ended-war-ukraine | Archived
At the first meeting, the Russians presented a set of harsh conditions, effectively demanding Ukraine’s capitulation. This was a nonstarter. But as Moscow’s position on the battlefield continued to deteriorate, its positions at the negotiating table became less demanding. So on March 3 and March 7, the parties held a second and third round of talks […]
Regarding territorial issues, parts of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Donbass would remain under Russian control
Moscow ostensibly wanted Kiev to slash the size of its army to 85,000 people, while Ukraine insisted on retaining a strength of 250,000.
Edit: Replaced “reporter” with “politician” in the post title
Edit2: Changed title from “microphone cut” to “segment cut short” in the title
I AM THE IMMIGRANT YOU LOSER
i dont understand the point of that. Explain, i think you read stuff about me personally into this, Like i would be Anti-Immigration or something , this is a Political Forum and in it one Discussion , if able the Political Positions of certain Facions Leading Powerstruggles , in this case the BSW of Sarah Wagenknecht a saved Proclaim “Leftwing” Party , and its Position on immigration , it is not my Position. Your Identity as a Immigrant is obviously relevant to general Topic but what is the Point here ?
Should more Immigrants be Produced , extracted ? Did you like to leave your homeland for X Factor reasons ?
You are the one who assumed that I’m only pro immigration because I’m “privileged” as if that’s the only reason to be pro immigration. And not because of solidarity with all workers, and not wanting people to die at borders or be deported. You are the one defending the completely unhinged anti immigration position using Marxist language.
Base - Questions - the Economic relations (Focus Macro Relations )
-So do you want the “industrial Reserve Army” of the Place you live in currently to Increase or not Increase ? Why ?
-Is it important to you to keep this “surplus socity of unemployed and Migrants” ?
-And how absolut is this Position is it for times of prosperity or also for times of economic downturn ?
-The Artisans and Craftsman , should they be recruited from the Periphery with Illustrive Jobs or should the Companies better be forced to educated their craftsman themself insted of extrating them from the Periphery ?
Superstructure- Questions the Ideology (Individuum in Focus)
-Are you Inclusive person ? Are you Racist ?
-Are you Cultural Supramacist / Tolerant ? (in relation to Immigrants)
-Are you Leftwing ?, Rightwing ? . Xenophobe ? (in relation to ImmigraTION)
-Categorization of Immigants along Kultural , Racial , Historical lines
-What does X deserve ?
–>there is no “Pro Imigration” position in Marxism , it doesnt really exist . One is when not Moraly decayed “Pro Immigrant” (Xenia) , but you dont wish Ideologicly for homelands to be left desolated and people having to Move (I PUSH and PULL Factors) . One simply Helps people in need , but one does not “wish for more Needy People”.
what the fuck are you on about
Contrary to metaphysics, dialectics does not regard nature as an accidental agglomeration of things, of phenomena, unconnected with, isolated from, and independent of, each other, but as a connected and integral whole, in which things, phenomena are organically connected with, dependent on, and determined by, each other. The dialectical method therefore holds that no phenomenon in nature can be understood if taken by itself, isolated from surrounding phenomena, inasmuch as any phenomenon in any realm of nature may become meaningless to us if it is not considered in connection with the surrounding conditions, but divorced from them; and that, vice versa, any phenomenon can be understood and explained if considered in its inseparable connection with surrounding phenomena, as one conditioned by surrounding phenomena. Contrary to metaphysics, dialectics holds that nature is not a state of rest and immobility, stagnation and immutability, but a state of continuous movement and change, of continuous renewal and development, where something is always arising and developing, and something always disintegrating and dying away. The dialectical method therefore requires that phenomena should be considered not only from the standpoint of their interconnection and interdependence, but also from the standpoint of their movement, their change, their development, their coming into being and going out of being.