• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 days ago

      Pretty high given they’re already saying this isn’t going to be a one day strike, but gonna last a week. There’s no way Iran just sits and absorbs it.

      • I hope so. Honestly I am hoping that this is the peak of the huberous from the US and their puppet, and that this can put a close on their reign of terror. Especialy right now I belive the US is still drained of resources, due to ukraine.

          • Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            7 days ago

            Iran was pretty serious about their red lines in the last tit for tat. The response by israel to True Promise Two was rather pathetic which is why True Promise Three never happened.

            israel forgetting that it had to back down is in line with their habit of believing their own propaganda lies. Its similar to how they forgot about how bad things get when they try to hold ground against The Resistance instead just of bombing civilians. I think they will be shocked by the response to this strike and it may be enough to break them because I don’t think Iran will stop until they are done.

            • Munrock ☭@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              7 days ago

              It just has to be bad enough that all of the “dual-citizenship” settlers get rattled, unsettle, and fuck off back to where they came from. It’s not a country but a project, and its viability ends if it doesn’t have enough participants.

            • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 days ago

              The response by israel to True Promise Two was rather pathetic which is why True Promise Three never happened.

              I disagree. While the Israeli response wasn’t as visually impactful as Operation True Promise II, it paved the way for the current Israeli attack that’s taking place, taking out the advanced radars for air defence systems. HAWK, S-300, etc.

              • Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                This was only ever stated by isisrael. There was little to no evidence that they hit more than one radar dish.

                Furthermore if israel felt like Iran was vulnerable to attack there is no reason israel would have stopped at one bombing run. If Iran felt it had lost its defensive capabilities that would be an existential threat and they would have had no choice to make decisive strikes.

    • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Stealth works, plus Israel already took out Iran’s most advanced radars, their S-300 fire control radars, in previous attacks. After the initial attack waves, even non stealth aircraft likely entered Iranian airspace. Plus Israel has advanced stand off weapons like air launched ballistic and cruise missiles that can be fired from hundreds or even over a thousand kilometres away from the target.

        • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Taking some shots at the hot exhaust of an F-35, while a commendable achievement for a group such as Ansarallah, is not the same as shooting one down. At the end of the day, they shot down zero planes.

          “Stealth” is a valuable technological concept that was first discovered by the Soviets in the 1960s, that an object’s radar return is related to its shape and not only it’s size, and thus can be minimised by changing it’s shape.

          Clearly it works, we’ve had many cases of stealth aircraft taking their adversaries by complete surprise, from the Gulf war to Yugoslavia to now. There are videos online now where you can hear Israeli aircraft in the background over Iranian skies.

          Is it a Hollywood tier invisibility cloak? No, and it’s possible to shoot down stealth aircraft. But it’s a force multipler, which is why China is working very hard on their 6th generation stealth aircraft and their own analogue to the F-35, called the J-35.

            • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Yeah I’m sure that China is investing billions and betting their future air force and navy strategy on “joke technology”. The Chinese engineers working on the J-35, J-36 and J-50 just got brainwashed by NATO propaganda. China should just build a bunch of Flankers instead, so they can end up like the Russian Air Force that can’t penetrate Ukrainian controlled airspace 3 years into a war and just lob glide bombs ad infinitum, while Israel can penetrate deeply into Iran on their third attack. Whatever.

              As for jamming, that’s exactly where stealth/low observability being a force multipler comes in. If your radar cross section is much lower, you need a lot less energy to jam and effectively mask your radar signature, and the jamming is effective over exponentially longer distances. Yes the effects of stealth technology are exaggerated by propaganda and movies, and of course it’s possible to shoot down stealth aircraft, but it’s still effective.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Last I checked, Russian airforce is absolutely dominating the airspace in Ukraine. Meanwhile, Russia has also demonstrated that it’s far safer and smarter to use strategic bombers to launch long range hypersonic missiles without any need for stealth. The fact that you think Russian approach in Ukraine hasn’t been effective tells me that you have an incredibly superficial understanding of what’s happening there.

                Meanwhile, as the link explains in plain English, Israel had to send agents to disable AD systems on the ground in order to accomplish their attack. In fact, last time they tried to do this, they had to turn back because their jets did get painted. Hence, why they ended up developing an elaborate new strategy here.

                I’m not saying stealth tech doesn’t give any edge at all, obviously it shortens the response window for the opponent. However, it’s not a game changer that people seem to think it is, nor has it actually been tested against any peer competitors with advanced militaries.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Because Iran is a paper tiger and are completely unable to mount any kind of response. They have sent ~100 UAVs and almost all of them have been shot down (though that is according to the IDF) Otherwise Iran has been silent on action, but loud on words. Just like they were before the attack.

      Here is what Iran has done so far ~18 hours after the attack.

      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/6/13/live-explosions-reported-in-iran-amid-israel-tensions (nothing)

      Meanwhile Israel is still continuing to run roughshod all over Iranian Airspace with impunity and attacking targets. Mossad is operating on the ground and very well may be planning to assassinate more senior officials.

      This is what Iran said before the attacks:

      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/12/iran-doubles-down-as-us-signals-israel-could-strike-during-nuclear-talks Note that most of the spokesmen for the Iranian response in that article are confirmed dead by the Iranian government as well as the IDF.

  • supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Too many global south nations obsessed with being right and convincing their very oppressors that they are being treated unfairly. Boo hoo, you are running a state full of brown people and want sympathy from genocidal racists?

    Oh, is a nuke Unislamic? I guess your generals can let god know when the zios send them to him.

    Oh, you want to engage in talks? Let me know how that went for Russia and Gaza, not even a month ago.

    Oh, are you building an alliance? China and Russia won’t even end trade with the entity.

    Why do they want to lead a state when they have zero state craft? If they want to be praised by the west, just bring in the shahs of sunset back in power and let them hand everything over to BP and ExxonMobil.

    Edit: i dont mean to disrespect Islam or Muslims above. I just think they are being goody two shoes more than they need to.

    • Malkhodr @lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The nuclear fatwa drives me crazy. Astagfurallah, this is an issue of anhilation against your people, under such a circumstances it’s absurd to issue such a general statement regarding a defensive deterrent.

      The reformists as a whole are so naive about reproachment with the west and its mind boggling to me. How is it that the principalists, literal conservative islamists, are more rational on the topic of geopolitics but can’t figure out that insane morality laws aren’t worth defending and only delegitmize their leadership to the public.

      I’m not going to say Iran should respond with full force. They are a country if 80 million people, so I feel restraint is a fair response to the bloodthirsty imperialists. However if you are going to show restraint then why can’t you take safer approaches to geopolitics and domestic matters.

  • Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Iran is retaliating faster than I expected. Looks like this might be more than another “Nothing Ever Happens”

  • rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wonder what happened to the Iranian air defenses. Have they been hacked or why they underperform against the zionist aggression…

    Ahh, I have way too many questions.

  • NotMushroomForDebate@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Air strikes should only be considered as a last resort. However, based on their comments and behavior, no positive outcomes can be expected. We made the decision to preemptively strike Iran for these reasons.