• tricerotops [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    13 days ago

    Recalling how he fired 27 of the team of 30 student workers in a sales enablement team he was leading at the time, Clark told Giz that the group now gets more “done in less than a day, less than an hour what they were taking a week to produce.”’

    “In the area of efficiency,” he added, “it made sense to get rid of people.”

    If you’re expecting your army of interns to be productive I don’t really know what to tell you

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Yes, I’m well aware of all the cultural programming bullshit that everyone is propagandized under. But I’m surprised that this isn’t seen as the ultimate scapegoat for the left to use.

      “Hey young men, look at this disgusting pig blow raspberries at all of us for ruining your life. Time we yanked his precious money out of his trotters. Let’s see how porky likes it when he’s made poorer.”

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        13 days ago

        Management is historically a job done by the elderly and infirm. Capitalism elevated these positions to positions of power rather than support.

        Ideally advanced prediction algorithms would liberate these people from the burden of management work and allow for them to live off the surplus value created by the increase in worker productivity that those algorithms help enable.

        In Western society though, management isn’t seen as a job for those who can’t work, and is instead a position of power granted to those who refuse to work and wish to extract that surplus for themselves. So we see this relationship that should exist being inverted and a self-cannibalization of productivity as the unproductive managerial class turns the tool of their own destruction upon the very workers that support them.

      • Runcible [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        beyond expanding on this while ai might be able to do the job of an intern, an intern learns and grows into a competent professional who should be doing tasks that require judgement. If AI kills entry level positions where do they think experienced staff will come from?

  • john_brown [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    13 days ago

    At this point I’m torn between believing that the c-suite is too stupid to understand AI isn’t going to effectively replace workers, or they know it’s not going to replace workers but they need to come up with something to justify the layoffs to keep the stock price high for the next quarter so they can get their golden parachute and fuck off to ruin some other company next

  • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    13 days ago

    [AI] doesn’t ask for a pay raise

    Aren’t these fuckers supposed to have gone to business school? You’re buying the LLM chatbot from another company, which is hemorrhaging money in an attempt to get market dominance. What do you think happens next?

  • Euergetes [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 days ago

    it doesn’t ask for a pay rise

    is this kayfabe or are the C suite suits really this fucking dumb? unless your company runs the entire goddamn model, no license-no sibscriptions, you ARE going to pay more.

    but perhaps they know this and are trying to signal to labor that they will only have the chance to keep their jobs if they don’t ask for pay rises.

    Cruelty or Stupidity

  • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 days ago

    And people still deny class antagonism. I think in many respects, so long as you’re dealing with a secular de-facto-materialist person (who will have idealist biases but claims to only really consider observable reality), understanding the irreconcilability of class antagonisms might be the main thing for making people socialists.

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’ve been considering making a short-form video essay on how the rich are all buddy-buddy. They run the world and they have a strong sense of class solidarity. One of the main examples on how a lot of Jewish elites in Germany willingly supported the nazis, and were ok with being the “patsies” so to speak for the porks as a whole.

      People need to be made more aware on how the rich hypocritically use leftist tactics and philosophy to organize their class. What is a network but capitalist unionizing?

      • tricerotops [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        13 days ago

        tbh im not a big fan of the idea that capitalists are buddies and collude in smoke filled back rooms. Im sure it does happen sometimes but the fact of the matter is the incentives are obvious enough that explicit collusion is not necessary.

      • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’d say that a trust is a real capitalist union (and other similar formations). Networks don’t have any sort of binding element, usually, and are extremely hierarchical.

        In any case, I think that if you believe you can make a good video on the subject, you should go for it!

        • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 days ago

          You just mentioned the reason why I think a lot of capitalists use blackmail and weird rituals to keep one another in line. They bind one another through socially pressured pedophilia, or drug use, or even simple stuff like lies about how much money they actually have.

          Although I haven’t really figured out if this is to make the public think that capitalists aren’t bound together (by having their connections more secretive) or because there are genuine disagreements between different sectors of bourgeoisie. I can’t imagine every capitalist is fully aware of the game.

          • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 days ago

            Outside of trusts and the like, the capitalists are in competition with each other and their broad conspiring is basically to maintain a beneficial playing field for that competition because they’re all angling to become as rich as they can, and anyone who isn’t is replaced by a competitor who is.

  • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I unironically just insist on never referring to the rich as humans, they are pigs. Same goes for people who demand privileges for being white or men or whatever. That’s purely the logic of the pig, pure gluttonous hedonism and if someone gets hurt, all the better!

    Look at how giddy the pigs are oinking about ruining your life for free money. Inb4 “just start your own business and become one of us, filthy poor!” as if the majority of businesses started don’t fail.

    • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’ve known far too many pigs (the animal) to attribute them the same level of shortsighted greed and gluttony and lack of empathy as billionaires. They are monsters, below even the lowest of animals.

  • woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 days ago

    Too bad constant capital like AI doesn’t generate surplus value, only humans do. You can’t exploit machines, they only transfer their own value to the product over their lifetime.

    Even if replacing those workers with LLMs in whatever field this is actually works, profit increases will only be temporary until competing firms also do it and prices start falling below what they were before.

    Having a higher ratio of constant to variable capital will help them set prices above values, so they can appropriate value produced in other sectors, but even that might be offset by the falling rate of profit. Or the burst of the bubble / the next crisis.

    In the end, AI or no AI, all capitalists want to form a monopoly, to be able to price gouge and appropriate surplus value produced in other sectors or by smaller firms.

  • PurrLure [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    13 days ago

    I thought this was an onion article on first glance.

    I guess the Onion equivalent would be “CEOs extremely aroused at idea of firing employees over AI”.

      • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        Idk i think a firing squad is ironic enough for people who get off on firing people. And it’s only quick if the bullets hit something vital, lol

        But if you want lasting punishment i like how they treated emperor Puyi, just made him do menial labor for the rest of his life.

        I like to think it actually rehabilitated him, but idk