• nasezero [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 days ago

    Last time I used Bluesky, the largest “antifascist” blocklist was run by UWU-“I’m-a-small-bean”-type sexpests who would put leftist women who rejected them/asked them to stop harassing them and their friends on blocklists next to 4chan groypers and shit.

    Because of the way Bluesky works, when you get put on a blocklist you disappear completely from the perspective of any users subbed to the blocklist, even if those users follow you. So these sexpests just made a career of creeping on women across the site, getting rejected, putting them on the blocklist, and moving on after the blocked women were effectively silenced. You could not design a better social media platform for harassing women and getting away without suffering any social consequences if you tried. (Aside from just allowing it in the open like X, I guess.)

    • Mihr@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think that person got cancelled and that list is no more lol.

      Blocklists aren’t great, but I think they’ve lost their shine. Most users I think understand now that it’s very easy for those to become personal grievance lists and don’t pay much attention to them.

      It’s not a great site and I’m only there because of how Twitter is and Mastodon feels dead and unwelcoming to me. Really, maybe we don’t need microblogging anymore.

  • Good.

    https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/10f71f88-cb18-4056-823c-b46324bd0913.jpeg

    He is an ableist shitass, among other things, and I have NO idea why half of you still idolize him as being “leftist” when he’s no different to half the socdems online who survive on internet drama rather than anything of fucking substance.

    We need to start doing more litmus tests like the libs imagine we do already; coz if y’all are upset for some guy who talks about neurodivergent folk the same way Fox news anchors talk about classroom litter boxes, then I dont know when the fuck we are getting any kind of revolution beyond ameriKKKa with healthcare subsidies

    • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Someone once said iirc basically he is what happens when you dunk on the most wilfully ignorant people online and slowly start to think that it makes you a genius. I think that more or less describes him up to and including his ableism and transphobia. I suspect that he thinks he’s just being “provocative”, and yeah, being an outspoken bigot tends to provoke people… Asshole.

      • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Someone once said iirc basically he is what happens when you dunk on the most wilfully ignorant people online and slowly start to think that it makes you a genius.

        Many such cases! a-little-trolling

        It’s funny because BE also has many unprincipled and ignorant geopolitical takes. Wasn’t he an Uyghur Genocide guy? So he can’t even claim to be the genius geopolitics understander.

        • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          He also does the whole “I’m not like other streamers, I’m a well-adjusted person who doesn’t cultivate parasocial relationships and isn’t addicted to drama” thing while spending 19 hours a day on social media obsessively posting about random streamer nobodies and getting banned from twitter 35 times a month

        • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Iirc his position is that the claim of an actual genocide is obviously incorrect but that china is committing “cultural genocide”. Never mind that this take is self defeating because an actual “cultural genocide” would just be a genocide. Evidence included “they require Uyghur children to receive their schooling in Mandarin”, which is not to my knowledge true. I could be wrong but my understanding is that members of registered ethnic minorities actually have an explicit right to receive schooling in their own language, but they also must be taught Mandarin… Which seems reasonable to me.

          • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            There are countless dialects and languages spoken by ethnic minorities in China, all of whom have to learn mandarin in school, for the purposes of being able to communicate. It’s just the same in literally almost every other country, there is mandatory instruction in the official national language. The difference between China and most countries is that they also provide classes in the local dialect/language.

            Liberals don’t actually care about “cultural genocide” though, they celebrate it when it’s done against Russian minorities in Eastern Europe. NYT writers cream their pants in ecstasy every time they hear about how Ukraine is “cleansing” their land of Russian cultural influence. Just last week, there was an NYT piece about the necessity of purging Russian language and culture from Ukraine to curb separatism. Liberals love “cultural genocide” when they and their favorite nazi buddies do it. It’s only a bad thing to them when it can be used as a bad faith cudgel.

            • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Just last week, there was an NYT piece about the necessity of purging Russian language and culture from Ukraine to curb separatism.

              Just a complete reversal of cause and effect by “journalists”, lmao. not-a-journalist

            • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              The difference between China and most countries is that they also provide classes in the local dialect/language.

              That was my understanding and what I was getting at, yeah. If you have a source I would love it because I have heard this more than once, and went looking for something to back it up but haven’t had much luck either way.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I fucking hate this shit.

    Liberal tone policing is one of many forms of classism that ultimately functions to ensure the only people with voices are those who conform to speaking in a specific manner of speaking determined by the bourgeois who control the platform. It is essentially controlling tone to shut out people who speak differently to the middle income suburban crowd of people with fairly decent upbringings.

    It shuts out everyone who might have a rougher background, internationally it shuts out everyone that comes from cultures where rougher backgrounds are more accepted socially, it shuts down speech from cultures where what we call “bants” in the UK is just socially acceptable and expected.

    I grew up in squats. I didn’t “speak right” for a long time. I learned to speak in the sniff your own farts style that online liberals expect and I switch between tones based on audience where I feel I’m forced to. Not everyone can do this and a huge portion of the working class who don’t speak right but have perfectly valid (and sometimes good) opinions are shut out just because some fucking liberal can’t take the fact that they pepper the things the write with swearsies and fruitful imagery.

    It’s classist and I fucking hate it. I will always loudly oppose tone policing. I do not give a fuck if someone is rude while they say correct things, they should not be shut out. Doing so is bourgeois moralism.

    Anyone celebrating this just because it’s Empanada is wrong.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes exactly. Get people on actually important shit, not their tone. Tone does not make someone incorrect, and almost everyone will have a bad tone once in a while just because mood is a thing.

    • Angelevo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agree on not excluding people for how they use language, 100%.

      Seeing someone present themselves as “Agent of Chaos and Hate” on a platform that is meant to be the opposite, is a good reason to do something about them. There are other platforms like 4chan for people like that.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s literally just fruity language knowing full well liberals will fucking hate him because he disagrees with them at a spiritual level on almost every single topic.

        The dude doesn’t filter himself for you and leans into the fact he knows you’ll hate him anyway. You’re just justifying your classism and finding your own way to shut down takes that you personally disagree with by saying “he’s rude about them”. You’re doing exactly what I just fucking said is classism.

        I don’t know what else to say. You’re a classist. A stinky middle income liberal that demands people speak a certain way or be excluded from the space. If you’ve ever wondered why the working class turns away from liberals it’s because they can feel the classism permeating every conversation you have with them, although most of the time they’ll communicate it as “elitism”. It’s exactly the kind of offputting shit from the libs that the far right has seized upon and pandered to successfully by the likes of Farage and so on. They lean into it, they tell the working class “yes you’re right about those stuck up elitist liberals” and then they become best buds over hatred for the way you judge them and behave towards them from the high castles of liberal moralism you’ve created to shut them out.

          • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            48
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            you’re doing it right now, just oozing smugness smuglord

            You know how poc can tell when they’re speaking to a racist through various cues and feelings without any overt direct racism occurring? Well it’s the same for classism.

            • Angelevo@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You do not really know when to stop, do you? The ad hominem attacks simply make it completely uninteresting to interact with you. Even if your points are valid, which I am not getting in to, they will not be read (at least by me). Some people do enjoy fighting people online. I do not.

              If that feels/seems like classism to you, fine. Have a nice day.

              EDIT: Also, if that picture is what you have in your head when reading my replies – you are projecting. I have literally never felt like that while conversing online. Nor in real life really. You assume far too much.

              • Horse {they/them}@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                42
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                The ad hominem attacks

                she isn’t doing an argumentum ad-hominem, she’s just insulting you, those are different things (not that it would matter as this isn’t a formal debate)

                “your argument is incorrect because you are a dickhead” ← ad hominem

                “you are a dickhead” ← just an insult

              • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                43
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                You do not really know when to stop, do you?

                Holy shit if you don’t want me to fucking reply to your smug ass bullshit just stop replying with smug ass fucking bullshit?

                ad hominem

                You people say these debate pervert words because you think they’re magic words that automatically place you higher than the other person, in every fucking sentence you’re just looking for ways to elevate yourself above me instead of understand me. You all think you’re digital harry potter casting EXPECTO PATRONUM every time you say this cringe ass shit. Magic “i win” reddit bullshit instead of trying to actually level with someone. All ego.

                Yes it’s fucking classism.

                Cast some more magic spells harry, logical fallacy my slippery slope. Now I’m just being mean, I wasn’t lying when I said I fucking hate this shit as you can see.

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                28
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Even if your points are valid, which I am not getting in to, they will not be read (at least by me).

                “Lol that picture of a smug vapid piece of shit has exactly zero resemblance to me”

                I’d like to hold up a mirror to you for a second if you’ll allow me:

                If you were a FUCKING FRACTION as smart as you clearly think you are, wouldn’t you take a second to read the room?

                • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I never associate “Ad hominem”, “whataboutism”, etc to magic words but it’s exactly how people see it. They use it and boom they win the argument.

      • RedSturgeon [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        2 days ago

        BlueSky actively removes accounts made by trans comrades and people in general suffering under imperialism. Platform that is meant to be the opposite of chaos and hate, my ass.

      • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        No. The problem isn’t that he calls himself an “agent of chaos and hate”, it’s that he’s a fucking bigot. I don’t care that he’s rude, that’s just liberal brainworms. I care that he’s a massive piece of shit bigot. And yeah, being a bigot is also “rude” but I hope you appreciate that that’s not what’s wrong with bigotry.

      • RustyVenture [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 days ago

        Bluesky is a platform that’s meant to be the opposite of chaos and hate? I do suppose the genocide denial and warmongering isn’t considered chaotic or hateful because it’s the default mode for liberals, but no hate? lol. lmao even.

        • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Its the old “white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice” again.

          (I’m sure this is a familiar text to Hexbear readers, but for those visiting, this is quoted from MLK’s Letter From Birmingham Jail

        • Angelevo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That is the gist of what I got from its presentation when it was new. I hardly nor visit most social media, my perspective may be dated and/or flawed.

  • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    are they wrong? tone policing is bad of course but the guy is rude and a piece of shit.

    lets play a word game. every transphobe should be x. what is x?

    • Blakey [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re wrong that the correct response is to hide his posts and mark them “rude”, I guess. The correct response is to ban him for being a bigoted dickhead.

    • SickSemper [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      He’s also a an anti black racist who won’t stop using the term house slave to refer to an Arab sellout. I’ve defended him before for being a bastion against liberal Zionism years before 10/7, but yeah fuck him

      • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        sadly, we do not have the technology for mind wiping. but we do have handy high speed lead applicators that can clear a mind of any transphobic thoughts.

  • SwitchyandWitchy [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve seen it claimed in the comments here that this is liberal tone policing, but also that BadEmpanada takes the “bullying works” attitude towards interacting with liberals that we have here in the past. I’m not sure which is true, fortunately I don’t know anything about him other than that he’s transphobic. I don’t think both can be true unless BluSky does this to other people who don’t bully. Bullying is not a tone issue, it’s antisocial behavior and some amount of censorship of it is appropriate.