The judge reached a verdict that Title VII only protects “firing someone simply for being homosexual or transgender,” but that it does not protect transgender or gay people from “harassment”
“In sum, Title VII does not bar workplace employment policies that protect the inherent differences between men and women,”
Judge Kacsmaryk further argued that disparate treatment of transgender employees does not constitute unequal treatment, reasoning that “a male employee must use male facilities like other males”—a statement that erases transgender identity altogether. He extended that logic to dress codes and pronouns, claiming that requiring employees to adhere to clothing standards and pronoun use based on their assigned sex at birth is not discriminatory because it applies “equally” to everyone.
We are so cooked
Well, I rule that federal judges can be [REDACTED] in workplaces or at home or the streets.
Its not descrimination, [REDACTED] applies equally to everybody who thinks this.
“you’re not being fired, you’re just being harassed to a permanent end”
Those LGB people sure now feel stupid for missing the obvious.
Nah, the drop the T crowd will/does blame us for pushing too far. Same as a lot of libs. I’ve already seen this rhetoric a lot.
Judge Kacsmaryk
He’s horrible and he’s fundie lunatic. So - of course - the GOP judge shops and funnels cases to him (and judges like him) where the GOP can basically be 100% certain how they’ll rude.
Notable cases
Conservative groups have strategically chosen to file lawsuits challenging many Biden administration policies in Kacsmaryk’s division. Kacsmaryk is the only federal judge in the Amarillo Division of the Northern District; 95% of lawsuits filed there are assigned to him.
Ninja edit. The Wikipedia page seems like it might be intentionally bland and shitty. If you’re interested in him and judge shopping - you’ll have to find articles.
amerikkka is such a joke lmao. true indictment of liberalism that it couldnt prevent even the most basic of abuses of the system if you just play by the rules
Not even liberalism, this is just a condemnation of common-law as a concept.
Like, this couldn’t happen in France and France is plenty liberal, but they don’t use court decisions to establish wide standing legal precedent
Nobody wants to work!
The workplace:
How could people not want to participate in society?
The society:
lmao what
We’re only doing what the federal courts want.
